Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br />r-- <br />~ <br />e' <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br />. <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />; ~ 'I <br /> , <br /> I, <br /> 'I <br /> :' <br />:, <br />" <br /> ,: <br /> <br /> ~ I I <br /> i j <br /> I.' <br />~ <br />,- I <br /> ~ ,J <br /> ", <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />23 <br />(35,000 ota) s~ep8. they were .elected beoause they are the <br /> <br />maximum power plant oapaaities ot Parker and Hoover Dams. <br /> <br />This li.t of nine (g) alternaUve. and any other <br /> <br />alterna~ive8 which may be ottered tor consideraUon, will be <br /> <br />evaluated uaing a variety of criteria. <br /> <br />One major 80urC. of evaluatlnq criteria will co.e tr <br /> <br />tile Hater llesource Council-. 80-called prinoiple. aneS <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />standards. These quidelin.. require that we eVAluate all <br /> <br /> <br />alternatives for thoir eftects on national ecenomic eSevelopae t, <br /> <br /> <br />environmental quality, r.qlonal development and .ocial <br /> <br /> <br />wcll-bein<J. <br /> <br /> <br />The Water Resource Council'. list ot criteria i. a vety <br />, <br /> <br />compre~ensi ve test which will insure thAt all of lIoover'. <br /> <br />purpoue., flood control, water oonservation, and power <br /> <br />production, are taken into full conaideration in the s.lectio <br /> <br />of any flood control operation plan. <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />In analyzin9 the alternative. tor their oontribution <br /> <br />to national economic development we will consider .uch thing. <br /> <br />as benefits from reduotion in flood damage8, increa.ed water <br /> <br />:_'; conservlltion and hydropower qeneration, and improved watel' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,,-, <br /> <br />quality. <br /> <br />Environmental quality impacts could include change. <br /> <br />in water quality, partioularly with re9ard to salin1ty, and <br /> <br />~pact8 on wildlite end their habitat due to chanq.. 1n flood <br /> <br />frocquency. <br /> <br />c <br />