Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />A two-year study, Lower Gunnison River Basin Wetland Inventory & Evaluation, <br />by Rector, Mustard and Windell, 1978, revealed the observation of one bald <br />eagle and no threatened or endangered plants. A biological assessment was <br />completed and submitted to USFWS in accordance with Section 7(c) of Public Law <br />95-632. <br /> <br />None of the listed species appear to be affected by the proposed action. <br /> <br />D. Environmental Consequences <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Environmental impacts for each of the alternate plans are displayed <br />in Table Al-4. Primary impacts will occur on those wetlands that have developed <br />since irrigation was first introduced in the valley. <br /> <br />Wetland Impacts <br /> <br />Wetlands impacted by the Salinity Control Program primarily have <br />developed as a result of introducing irrigated agriculture into the area about <br />100 years ago. These wetlands may be fed by water seeping from canals, laterals <br />and ditches, fed by water accumulating in natural depressions, fed by subsurface <br />or ground water being forced to the surface by geological conditions, or fed <br />by runoff water following natural or manmade drainage ways back to the river. <br />As irrigation systems and practices are made more efficient the supply of <br />water feeding these areas will diminsh. With diminishing water supply vegetation <br />changes naturally will occur. The Salinity Control Program does not propose <br />to drain wetlands for the purpose of converting them to agricultural or other <br />uses. <br /> <br />Because impacts will result from improving the efficiency of existing irrigation <br />systems and practices it is reasoned that the degree of impact for each alterna- <br />tive plan will be inversely proportional to the change in irrigation efficiency. <br />If efficiency remains unchanged, no loss of wetlands is expected; a 10 percent <br />increase in efficiency causes a 10 percent loss in the irrigation induced wet- <br />lands. Impacts will be confined to the respective areas improved by the alterna- <br />tive plans and will be commensurate with the type of improvement made. Localized <br />areas obviously dependent on ditch seepage will be dried up by ditch lining. <br />Larger areas fed by surface, subsurface, or ground water return flows are not <br />expected to vanish completely, however, they may be reduced in size or degree <br />of wetness because less water will be available as return flow. Similar wetlands <br />and riparian wetlands elsewhere in the valley will be unchanged. Secondary <br />impacts will be noticed along earth ditch banks as they are replaced by pipelines, <br />gated pipe or impervious lining. <br /> <br />IV-36 <br /> <br /> <br />The Environmental Subteam of the Interagency Multiple-Objective Planning Team <br />indicated the significant adverse environmental impact resulting from implementa- <br />tion of conservation measures to control salinity would occur on wetland habitat. <br />It is also recognized that salinity control, i.e., water quality improvement, <br />will be a beneficial environmental impact of the salinity control effort. <br />