Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />\.oJ <br />.... <br />N <br />:;1 <br /> <br />Current estimates indicate a gradual gro~th in the overall number of jobs <br />the project area. Emplo;~ent trend estimates perceive tbat the number of <br />in agriculture ~ill decline. All other sectors are expected to increase. <br />top employing sectors are expected to be ~holesale-retail trade, services, <br />government, mining and construction. <br /> <br />in <br />jobs <br />The <br /> <br />Historical and Archeological Resources <br /> <br />An archeological survey done under contract to the Colorado Division <br />of Highways near the area indicates the possibility of many sites of archeological <br />and historical importance ~ithin the general study area. However, there are <br />no known historical or archeological sites that wlII be affected by the proposed <br />salinity control work, which will occur in areas already disturbed by agricultural <br />activites. It is recognized, that the area has been occupied at various times <br />in the past and there is a possibility that cultural resources may be discovered <br />when working in previously undisturbed soils, The Colorado State Historic <br />Preservation Office has had discussion with the SCS to expedite both evaluation <br />and excavation of any sites discovered during construction for the alternative <br />implemented. Construction should be stopped for a maximum of 48 hours to <br />provide opportunity for a SHPO archeologist to observe the site, and to advise <br />the landowner as to potential eligibility for the National Register of Historic <br />Places, In addition, after construction is Slopped the Secretary of the Interior <br />will be notified through the Departmental Consulting Archeologist, Interagency <br />Archeological Services (IAS) , Washington, D.C. 20243, (202) 343-7105. IAS <br />will then initiate investigation within 48 hours to determine any necessary <br />data recovery pursuant to the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Regula- <br />tions (36 CFR 800) and Soil Conservation Service Regulations (7 CFR 656). <br /> <br />Wildlife Resources <br /> <br />wetlands are an important part of the total wildlife habitat in the <br />Lower Gunnison River basin. Wetlands comprise about 12 percent of the total <br />study area, and are important because of high vegetation and wildlife diversity, <br />dispersion and productivity. <br /> <br />Historically, broad river bottoms and adjacent drainages probably supported <br />extensive riparian woodlands, large, dense willow stands and extensive cattail <br />marshes. Some open water, generally surrounded or interspersed with cattails, <br />was present in oxbows and sloughs. Five important wetlands frequently men- <br />tioned in early descriptions are the ~ncompabgre river bottom, the Gunnison <br />river bottom, Happy Canyon, Spring Creek and Dry Creek. These wetlands sup- <br />ported high populations of deer, waterfowl dnd small game; important sources <br />of food and clothing for Indians and early settlers. <br /> <br />Agricultural, residential and industrial development over the past 100 years <br />have had an impact on these wetlands. Fertile river bottom land has been <br />drained and cleared for cropland and livestock grazing has altered or destroyed <br />the understory in the stands that remain. <br /> <br />Agricultural development has also created new wetland habitat. counteracting <br />somewhat the loss of historic wetland habitat. The Gunnison Tunnel introduces <br />additional ~ater into the Lower Uncompahgre River basin that irrigates crops, <br /> <br />11'-33 <br />