My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06876
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:45 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:55:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.350
Description
Lower Gunnison Basin Unit - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
4
Date
5/1/1981
Title
Draft Report of the Lower Gunnison Salinity Control Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />This level can reduce salt loading by 162,000 tons through reduced <br /> <br />seepage from onfarm ditches, 120,000 tons from reduced deep percolation, and <br /> <br />31,000 tons from reduced tailwater ditch seepage. The 313,000 tons, a 71 <br /> <br />percent reduction in the salt load delivered to the river, can be achieved <br /> <br />at a one-time valley-wide installation cost of $275,000,000. <br />Economic Analysis <br /> <br />Basic data for the economic analysis was obtained through public <br /> <br />meetings, questionnaires, interviews with area residents, Water and Power <br /> <br />Resources Service and other federal and state agency personnel. Soil <br /> <br />Conservation Service employees, local leaders in the Lower Gunnison Salinity <br /> <br />Study area, research publications and experts in the field were contacted in <br /> <br />an attempt to improve the analysis. The procedure used in the economic <br /> <br />analysis emphasized the importance of compiling and analyzing the physical <br /> <br />data in a manner so that the data were sensitive to varying levels of <br /> <br />resource development. The analysis was based on comparing effects of the <br /> <br />various alternatives with effects of continuing ongoing programs. Water <br /> <br />Resources Council's current normalized prices for crops were used. One of <br /> <br />the most important aspects of the analysis was determining the effect of <br /> <br />continuation of ongoing programs so that each alternative could be judged <br /> <br />from that basis. Data estimates for present conditions were also <br /> <br />developed. <br /> <br />Onfarm Benefits <br /> <br />Crop budgets were developed for continuation of ongoing programs and <br /> <br />for future conditions under each of the alternative plans. Production costs <br /> <br />were identified with particular emphasis being placed on variable costs. In <br /> <br />cases where it was determined that yield levels and/or production costs <br /> <br />varied by soil classes, crop budgets were developed accordingly. <br /> <br />11-13 <br /> <br />001216 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.