My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06852
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06852
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:54:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05.R
Description
Hoover Dam/Lake Mead/Boulder Canyon Project
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1980
Title
"Hoover Dam Power Contracts" - Excerpted from the 1980 Annual Report of the Colorado River Board of California
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:0 <br /> <br />... <br />'- , <br /> <br />r-'" <br />- <br /> <br />~ <br />'- <br /> <br />In late 1980, the State of Nevada <br />wrote a letter to Western claiming a <br />right to contract for one-third of the <br />total marketable capacity and energy <br />from Hoover Powerplant, basing its <br />claim on its interpretation of the 1928 <br />louIder Canyon Project Act. Nevada <br />now receives 17.6259 percent of <br />Hoover power. A 134-page legal <br />memorandum was prepared by the <br />Nevada Attorney General's office and <br />its Washington, D.C. counsel in <br />support of the claim. Arizona, which <br />also currently has a right to the same <br />percentage of Hoover power as <br />Nevada, stated in a letter to Western <br /> <br />Colorado River South of Parker <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />that it too was entitled to one-third of <br />the Hoover power if Nevada is <br />entitled to that amount. California <br />contended that its right of renewal is <br />contained in the contracts and the <br />statute and that the California <br />agencies are entitled to renew their <br />64.7482 percent of Hoover capacity <br />and energy. <br /> <br />Fish and Wildlife Coordination <br />Act-Proposed Regulations <br /> <br />The Board's 1979 Annual Report <br />described proposed rules for <br />administering the 1958 Fish and <br />Wildlife Coordination Act which were <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />published in the Federal Register by <br />the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. As <br />a result of the comments of the Board <br />and agencies in the other western <br />states, the Fish and Wildlife Service <br />..dvised the public that the proposed <br />rlhs were beirc redrafted in res~ <br />to comments and that an <br />environmental impact statement on <br />the proposed rules would be <br />prepared, including various alternative <br />methods of complying with the 1958 <br />Act. <br />On December 18, 1980, the Fish <br />and Wildlife Service released new <br />proposed regulations in a Draft <br /> <br /> <br />I'~:~: '; <br />" .... <br />" "'" <br /> <br />.',-, <br />.....". ) <br />" ".:;,'J. <br />,,':' . '..r.~' <br />,. "",!,.l <br />"... .....s:;.' <br />.. ~ >;. (/ <br />~ ,': :';';'k: <br />,-~M'" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.