My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06848
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06848
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:54:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.10
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powel-Glen Canyon Adaptive Management
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1994
Author
Upper CO River Comm
Title
Protest of Western Rate Schedule Slip-F5 Pursuant to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Rule 211-Docket No EF95-5171-000
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />01355 1 <br /> <br />OR Afl <br /> <br />participating projects by failing to include full depletion projections for <br /> <br />some Federal projects that satisfy the Agreement's criteria for inclusion in <br /> <br />the rate. <br /> <br />The 1983 Agreement was negotiated by Western and Reclamation prior to the <br /> <br />1983 rate-setting process. In fact, that rate-setting process was the impetus <br /> <br />and motivation for the 1983 Agreement. After the 1983 Agreement was signed, <br /> <br />its requirements were put in place in determining the 1983 rate. This <br /> <br />contemporaneous interpretation'and application of the Agreement reveals the <br /> <br />true intent of the Federal agency negotiators and must be binding on them in <br /> <br />future rate-setting processes. <br /> <br />Significantly, the 1983 energy and capacity studies provided to Western <br /> <br />by Reclamation incorporated depletion data that were not objected to by the <br /> <br />Upper Division States, were not capped at the year 2010 level and reflected an <br /> <br />ulaltered ultimate full development schedule of the States' compact-appor- <br /> <br />tioned waters. Western used the studies as they were provided by Reclamation, <br /> <br />without applying Western's own "expertise" to artificially suppress the data <br /> <br />that result in a lower rate. This process was not opposed by Western's power <br /> <br />customers. <br /> <br />After initiating the 1990 rate process, Western (no doubt at the urging <br /> <br />of the power customers and their paid consultants) apparently realized that <br /> <br />there were other methods available to lower the Integrated Projects power <br /> <br />rates. If the 1983 Agreement were applied not only to push the financial and <br /> <br />depletion impacts of authorized CRSP projects that do not meet the tests of <br /> <br />the 1983 Agreement beyond the rate-controlling date but also to push the <br /> <br />depletions for State and private projects beyond that date, more water could <br /> <br />be assumed available to generate more electricity, so the rates could be <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.