Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,j'" <br />it <br />I .', <br />1;'1 <br />*If.,.: <br />, <br /> <br />r. <br /> <br />3946 <br /> <br />REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF RECLAMATION <br /> <br />U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERlO:ft, <br />BUREAU OF RECLA~UTION, <br />W08hington, D.O., February 16, 1900. <br />THE SECRETARY OF TIlE INTERIOR. <br />Sm: This is my report on a plan of develoJ?ment for the Ruedi Dam <br />and Reservoir, Colo. It is based upon and mcludes my proposed re- <br />port of October 2:l, 1909, which you approved and adopted on October <br />27, 1959. <br />Copie.s of the proposed report were t.ransmitted tothe affected States <br />pf the Arkansas a.ne] the Colorado Hover Basins, the Secretary of t.he <br />Army, and tothe interested Federal agencies Tor :review as required by <br />la~ and by interagency a.greement. All t.hose who received the re- <br />port, officially have replied except the States of Arizona and Nevada, <br />which would not be substantially affected by the proposed develop- <br />lnellt. Copies of the letters of comment received a're attached. . <br />The proposed project is supported by the State of Colorado and has <br />its full and uneqnivocal apP,'oval as evidenced by the letter of N 0- <br />vember 24, 1959, from the director of the Colorado '"Vater Conserva- <br />tion Board. In that letter, the State of Colorado also furniRhed as- <br />surance of its willingness to asSU1Ue. the 11"l',pa.yrn.ent obliga.tion for the <br />portion of the' cost of Ruedi Dam and Reservoir which may be al- <br />located to deferred J~1Unicipal and indust.rial water supply Ulider pro- <br />vision ofthe Water ioiupply Act of 1958, as follows: . <br />Should such a market, however, not develop to a degree sufficient to return <br />the costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, the State> of. <br />Colorado will llll(lertake repayment of the portion neces~ary to assure full re- <br />payment of municipal and industrial water supply costs. <br />As contemplated ill our proposed'report, certain inconsistencies ih <br />t.he operating principles for Ruedi Dam and Rooervoir set forth in <br />the attached regional director's report of September ~5, 1959, were <br />discussed wit.h officials of the St.ate of ColonHlo. By letter of .Tammrv <br />15, 1960, t.he director of the Colorado '"Vater Conser\"at.ion Board. <br />transmit.t.ed a fully executed copy of the ope.rating principles as <br />amended on December 30, 1959, by the several interested St.ate organi- <br />zations to eliminate those inconsiste.ncies. A copy of the amended <br />prin 'gles is attached to and m,l(le a pllrt of this report. These <br />an . ed principles hereby Rupersede.the operat.ing principles set. forth <br />i regional director's report;..us well as t.hose set. forth ill House <br />D ment 187, 83d Congress, o<<.-the Fryingpan-Arkunsas project.. <br />Ie comments of the State of Califonlia are concerned more di- <br />I' 'Y with the amendments it wishes to hfwe incorporated in leg-isla- <br />'.' ' to authorize thYfFr " I!pan-Arkunsas project. t.ha. n. with the report <br />: ' . uedl Dum and He ,bIr. The St.ate conelude.d. t.hat our proposed <br />jort does not up' . to be an adequllte project iij.lanning report <br />~. 1 <br />. . <br /> <br />