My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06828
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06828
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:10:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:54:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.250
Description
Wild and Scenic-Encampment River
State
CO
Date
10/1/1976
Author
Smith-Russell
Title
Encampment River-Supporting Material-Water Quality Summary Upper Encampment River-Hahns Peak Ranger District-Routt National Forest
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />,. I <br />.J''",' <br /> <br />f .")~.,; <br />~_v . <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />The United States Geological Survey, using regression techniques on <br />existing data from Routt County, developed the follovling equation: <br />. <br /> <br />TDS = ~16.0 + .659 X Specific Conductance <br />(26 data points, range 65 to 95D (conductance)) <br /> <br />FollowinG is a tahl" li~t.ina ,,~t.imiltp~ nf Tn". ripri\lpri usin') the <br />equa ti on - and an average of a 11 condu~ti ~ity - ~le~~u~~I~~nts for three <br />sites. Also included are average measured TDS values (6 samples) <br />at the same locations. <br /> <br />TABLE <br /> <br />Sampling <br />point <br /> <br />Ave. Measured <br />TDS (mg/l) <br />(6 samples) <br /> <br />Ave. Measured <br />Conductivity <br />/( Inl,r.:/cl1l <br />At 250C. <br /> <br />Calculated <br />TDS (mg/l) <br />(USGS equation) <br /> <br />DamfinoCr. <br />Stream <br />Gage <br /> <br />46 <br /> <br />37.5 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Eas.t Fk. <br />Weir <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />42 <br /> <br />38.5 <br /> <br />~1a i n Fk. <br />abv. <br />E.Fk. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />44 <br /> <br />44.1 <br /> <br />The calculated values of TDS are much lower than those measured - <br />due probably to the fact that the USGS equation must be extra- <br />polated considerably to include streams of as high quality as the <br />Encampment. Probably the actua 1 average va lue 1 i es somewhere between <br />the calculated value and the average of the six samples given in the <br />Table. <br /> <br />The optimum levels of TDS for stream productivity is about 400 mg/l <br />while the maximum safe level for aquatic life is 1500 mg/l. The <br />drinking water standard is 500 mg/l. Not only are the TDS levels <br />of the Encampment much below the critical level, they are also much <br />below optimum. Thus though the chemical quality of the Encampment <br />is exce 11 ent it wou 1 J be ra ted lower in product i v ity than streams wi th <br />higher TDS levels. Usually "soft" water such as the Encampment has <br />reduced abundance and diversity of aquatic organisms. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.