My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06813
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - BLM
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1980
Title
Control of Salinity from Point Sources Yielding Groundwater Discharge and from Diffuse Surface Runoff in the Upper Colorado River Basin - 1978-79 Status Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />W <br />Ut <br />c....;, <br />~) <br /> <br />I <br />l <br /> <br />;~j <br /> <br />2. Point Source - Stinking Spring (Onion Creek) <br /> <br />Onion Creek drains Fisher Valley and is tributary to the Colorado River. <br />The mouth of the creek is located 19 miles northeast of Moab, Utah. Base <br />flow originates in the La Sa1 Mountains and is used for irrigation of hay <br />fields in Fisher Valley. Base flow is approximately 2 cubic feet per <br />second (cfs) and salt concentration is 800 mg/1 as the creek enters the <br />"narrows" of Onion Creek Canyon. Stinking Spring discharges approximately <br />80 gpm into the creek from two major points; one yields 57 gpm at a <br />concentration of 18,980 mg/1, the other discharges 23 gpm at a concentra- <br />tion of 14,600 mg/1. These two combine to yield a total of 128 ac-ft <br />of water and 3,084 tons of salt annually. Salinity of Onion Creek below <br />Stinking Spring increases to 3,100 mg/1. If Stinking Spring water could <br />be kept from entering the Colorado River, the salt concentration at <br />Imperial Dam would be reduced by 0.24 mg/1. <br /> <br />Figure 3 shows the possible location of a control structure and collector <br />which would prevent saline spring water from entering Onion Creek and <br />divert it into a pipeline. It also shows the pipeline location and the <br />evaporation pond site. The pond would need to be lined to prevent brine <br />seepage through sandy soil into the Colorado River. Day (15) provides <br />a good manual on procedures to be followed in constructing brine ponds <br />and installing liners to reduce seepage. The cost-effectiveness and <br />benefits of the proposed project are computed as follows: <br /> <br />a. Construction/Development and Replacement Costs <br /> <br />(1) Collector System <br /> <br />Barrier dam and gravel sump <br /> <br />$ 20,000 <br /> <br />:) <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />3-inch, rigid PVC pipeline, <br />5 miles @ $60,000/mi1e . . <br />Air release valves. . . . . <br />Amount set aside for periodic <br />replacement of pipeline (assume <br />a 25-year life) $310,000 x 0.22 <br />(Sinking Fund Factor). . , . . . <br /> <br />(2) Evaporation Pond <br /> <br />Protective dike 20 feet high and hypa10n <br />liner on inside face of dike, <br />3194 running feet of dike @ $68/ft .. ... $ 217,192 <br /> <br />$ 300,000 <br />$ 10,000 <br /> <br />,\ <br /> <br />. . . . . . . $ 68,200 <br /> <br />Protective dike 6 feet high and hypalon <br />liner on inside face of dike, <br />2614 running feet of dike @ $12.40/ft. . $ 32,414 <br /> <br />Pond liner of 20 mil PVC material <br />(not covered), 64 acres or 309,760 sq. yds. <br /> <br />24 <br /> <br />k_4- <br />- =-, ','~,-,,,,, ~ -"", >g,-+~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.