Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />(0 <br />Ul <br />l';;' <br />1-' <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />;>j-'< <br /> <br />VII. CONTROL OF SALINE POINT SOURCE GROUNDWATER DISCHARGES <br /> <br />A. Determining Technical Feasibil ity <br /> <br />The proper design of a facility for controlling point source saline <br />groundwater discharges requires data collection about the origin of the <br />groundwater, how and where it discharges, the water itself, and terrain <br />of the surrounding area. First, a reconnaissance level investigation <br />should be made to determine if more detailed studies are warranted. <br />Measurements should be taken to determine the rate of waterflow, any <br />variation in quantity of flow, and electrical conductivity (concentration <br />of total dissolved solids [TDS]). The area surrounding the discharge <br />point should be inspected to see if a tract of flat land exists large <br />enough for an evaporation pond. Soil texture on the proposed site <br />should be noted. Apparent depth of soil and existence of rock outcrops. <br />should also be noted. <br /> <br />If reconnaissance investigations indicate a control project may be <br />feasible, more detailed studies can be made. This would entail gathering <br />additional information for the items discussed above. <br /> <br />B. Determining Economic Feasibility <br /> <br />Public Law 92-500, Clean Water Act of 1972, states that salinity standards <br />must be met. This should be done in the most economic manner technically <br />feasible. <br /> <br />-': <br /> <br />An economic analysis should include an accurate determination of the <br />project cost-effectiveness as well as local and downstream economic <br />benefi ts. Cost-effecti veness rel ates the total annual cost of a project <br />to the expected reduction in salt concentration as measured at Imperial . <br />Dam, California. Cost-effectiveness is an efficient yardstick to measure <br />and compare salinity control projects having equivalent downstream <br />benefits and can be applied to other agency programs and basinwide <br />efforts as well. Economic benefits are generally described in terms .Of <br />an incremental economic detrimental value related to salt concentration <br />changes at Imperial Dam. The economic detriment (or benefit) at Imper- <br />ial Dam is a composite value representing annual damages to downstream <br />municipal, industrial, and agricultural users in the United States. <br />This study uses an economic detriment value of $425,000 per mg/1 per <br />year based on $343,000 per mg/l per year (22) and indexed to 1979 dollars. <br /> <br />',' <br /> <br />J <br />'1 <br /> <br />, <br />< <br />-,., <br />'{ <br />1 <br />>1 <br /> <br />The computed reduction in salinity, as a result of each project, is the <br />annual sum of the positive effects of removing a given number of tons of <br />salt and the negative effects of detaining a given number of acre-feet <br />(ac-ft) of water. The removal of salt reduces the salt load, while <br />the loss of water raises the TDS concentration. The net effect will be <br />a lowering of the concentration if the amount of salt lost is high in <br />relation to the amount of water detained. Reductions in salt concentra- <br />. tions at Imperial Dam resulting from each project were computed using <br />data from Table E (7). <br /> <br /> <br />-1 <br />., <br />J <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br /> <br />",,- <br /> <br />,~" ;,,:;;;-$,CiJ.;'~,'%, <br /> <br />.;-. - <br />