Laserfiche WebLink
<br />c...J <br />(.;'1 <br />i-" <br />Uf <br /> <br />of Reclamation - 5) estimates that 500,000 tons of salt, or nearly one <br />half of the total subbasin salt load, are .produced annually by the <br />G1enwood and Dotsero Springs. <br /> <br />The effect of irrigation returnf10w on the salt load from groundwater <br />during the base flow period (winter) is very small for most subbasins, <br />especially those at high elevations. Soils being irrigated are the <br />alluvial, relatively well-drained deposits along streams. The distances <br />groundwater (irrigation returnflow) must travel before entering a stream <br />chan",j are, in most cases, relatively short. Therefore, water quality <br />data collected in December or January should reflect a minimal influence <br />from irrigated agriculture. However, the larger blocks of farmland <br />located on fine-textured, poorly drained soils, and/or at long distances <br />from streams can have a great influence on groundwater. Examples of <br />, these would be the Uinta and Price River Basins in Utah,the lower <br />'Gunnison and Grand Valley Projects in Colorado, and the Eden-Farson <br />Project in Wyoming. . <br /> <br />.Wa ter quality data were collected on dra i nagechanne 1 sin the Lower <br />Gunnison and Grand Valley areas thought to be yielding only irrigation <br />returnf10w. The annual salt loads from these channels were subtracted. <br />from salt loads estimated to be contributed by natura1.groundwater. All <br />of the base flow salt load contributed by the Price .River was believed. <br />to be from irrigation returnf10w and was subtracted from the total. An <br />average value of 50 percent of the base flow salt load was arbitrarily <br />set for irrigation returnf10w on the San Rafael, Duchesne, and Blacks <br />Fork Rivers, and Piceance Creek. A value of 20 percent was similarly <br />estimated for irrigation returnf10w salt load from the Big Sandy River. <br />These were all subtracted from computed total salt loads for the sub- <br />basins. Table 2 shows the results of this exercise. <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />It is estimated that the contribution of groundwater from natural <br />sources to the total salt load of the Green and COlorado Rivers above <br />their confluence is 38 percent. This is a reduction from the 55 percent <br />measured as groundwater-contributed salt load (41) . The remaining 17 <br />percent of salt load waul d theoretically be from i rri gation returnf1 ow. <br />during the;base flow period. This 38 percent from natural groundwater <br />sources is in contrast to the 58 percent estimated by the Environmental <br />Protection Agency to be from natural diffuse and point sources (16). <br />The EPA also estimates that the total annual yield to the salt load from <br />irrigation returnf10w is 41 percent and 1 percent from industrial and <br />municipal sources. BLM (3) estimated that surface runoff fr.omthe <br />pub1 ic lands yielded a total of 8 percent of the total salt load of the <br />Upper Basin. Surface runoff from similar lands owned or administered by <br />private individuals, states, Indian tribes, and other federal agencies <br />probably yields an additional 7 percent nf the Upper Basin salt load. <br />These estimates account for 95 percent of the total salt load. . The 5 <br />percent unaccounted for is well within the error of these calculations. <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />., <br />, <br /> <br />;} <br />., <br />I <br /> <br />',~ <br /> <br />"1 <br />, <br /> <br />,>'" <br /> <br />