My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06813
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - BLM
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1980
Title
Control of Salinity from Point Sources Yielding Groundwater Discharge and from Diffuse Surface Runoff in the Upper Colorado River Basin - 1978-79 Status Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />*;..0 <br />'." <br />.....;1 <br /> <br />no more than 50 percent, a reserve of vegetal cover will be created for <br />watershed protection and use by livestock during drought years. Grazing <br />use should be rotated to rest plants from continuous winter defoliation. <br /> <br />.--- <br /> <br />N <br /> <br />Table 1 shows the result of two treatments on reducing salinity in <br />surface runoff from highly saline lands in the Upper Basin States of <br />Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming. The winter grazing treatment reflects a <br />10 percent decrease in the amount of salinity compared to the un grazed <br />condition (based on discussion with Gregg Lusby - 27). Salinity control <br />through grazing management would cost over twice as much as that achieved <br />by total removal of livestock. However, salinity control through grazing <br />management still yields nearly two dollars in benefits for everyone <br />dollar spent. The reductions in livestock shown for winter grazing <br />(grazing management) may, in many cases, be accomplished in connection <br />with proposed adjustments in use as analyzed in grazing environmental <br />impact statements (EIS), e.g., adjustments proposed in the Grand Junction <br />Grazing EIS (4). <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />J:;^ ~ - .-.;,-_ -",,_ _d_~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.