My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06813
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:28 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.400
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agency Reports - BLM
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1980
Title
Control of Salinity from Point Sources Yielding Groundwater Discharge and from Diffuse Surface Runoff in the Upper Colorado River Basin - 1978-79 Status Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />Rauzi and Zingg (36) compared water intake data from many sites over <br />seven Great Plains States, representing a 'variety of soils and climate. <br />Water intake was significantly greater on ranges in good condition than <br />on those in poor condition, irrespective of soil texture. McGinty et al. <br />(30) found no significant differences in infiltration rate be~ween a 4- <br />pasture grazing system and a long-time enclosure, both presumably in <br />good condition. <br /> <br />Buwai and Trlica (8) and Trlica et al. (39) conducted defoliation studies <br />on a :'~,,1iarid northwestern Colorado rangel and. These data indicate the <br />effects of defoliation on plant health depend upon the species of plant, <br />stage of growth (phenology), and number of defoliations. A number of <br />plant species produced smaller herbage yields and showed reduced vigor <br />following multiple defoliations at a moderate level. They were most <br />, severely affected by heavy defoliations. A number of plant species <br />'recovered within 14 to 26 months after a single heavy defoliation. <br />Plants clipped when green or during the rapid growth stage did not make <br />complete recovery following the rest period. Cook and Childs (12) state <br />that plant vigor may have also been affected by the harsh conditions of <br />the desert site. The implication is that desert ranges in the Inter- <br />mountain area are in a delicate natural balance and can deteriorate <br />rapidly if not used correctly. <br /> <br />Laycock (24), using species composition and plant vigor as indices of <br />change, found desert ranges in poor condition improved when grazed only <br />in the fall, while those in good condition deteriorated under spring <br />grazing, Cook (11) found 60 percent util ization of cold desert plants <br />during winter was too severe to maintain plants in good vigor. The rate <br />of recovery of plants from defoliation was also proportional to the <br />initial state of plant vigor. Plants grazed when in low vigor were <br />slower to recover under complete rest. It was suggested that 50 percent <br />utilization would maintain optimum vigor and sustained yield. <br /> <br />W <br />c.n <br />o <br />1:;0 <br /> <br />""", <br /> <br />Costello and Turner (13) ,during a study of more than 100 exclosures, <br />found that recovery of perenni a 1 vegetati on (especi a lly shrubs) from <br />effects of grazing was very slow under natural conditions. Exclosures <br />over 30 years old showed the greatest percentages of the highly pala~ <br />table plants. Willard and Herman (42) report that improvement in range <br />condition is slow on the Northern Great Plains, even under grazing <br />management. This was true for grazing systems that did not allow at <br />1 eas t one full year of rest for pastures duri ng the grazi ng cycl e. <br />Greater improvement in soil and plant conditions was observed from <br />winter grazing than from rest-rotation. This was attributed to frozen <br />soils, reducing the effect of livestock trampling on soil . compaction. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />..",;~,,-, ",,"~,_, _~;,~f. <br /> <br />:i! <br />/11 <br /> <br />" <br />"I <br /> <br />.,? <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />., <br />~ <br />, <br />".''j <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />:~ <br />.~ <br />?' <br /> <br />.s <br /> <br />"{ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />,,- <br /> <br />. <br />>~ <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-; <br /> <br />-:j' <br />i <br />-J <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.