Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MAY 1982 <br /> <br />Harvest data, number of hunters, and success can be used to determine <br /> <br />the relative importance of an economic species. Tables 111-2 through 111-6 <br /> <br />show these data for the inventoried species. While the game management <br /> <br />units from which these data were obtained do not coincide perfectly with the <br /> <br />study area. they are still valuable in describing the wildlife resource. <br /> <br />Table 1II-2. Deer Harvest, Pressure, and Success for Game Management <br /> Units 72 and 73 <br /> Number of Percent <br />Year Harvest Hunters Success <br />1977 718 2033 33 <br />1976 710 1964 36 <br />1975 550 1633 34 <br />1974 729 1898 38 <br />.1973 1362 2950 46 <br />1972 878 16tl3 52 <br />1971 543 1236 44 <br />1970 792 1693 47 <br />1969 674 1426 47 <br />1968 626 1241 50 <br />Average 758 1776 43 <br /> <br />Table III-3. Elk Harvest. Pressure, and Success for Game Management <br /> Unit 72 and 73.* <br /> Percent <br />Year Harvest Hunters Success <br />1977 209 1268 16 <br />1976 182 1230 15 <br />1975 140 1111 13 <br />1974 73 679 11 <br />1973 46 694 7 <br />1972 98 674 14 <br />1971 118 1155 10 <br />1970 114 826 14 <br />1969 242 932 26 <br />1968 214 881 24 <br />Average 144 945 15 <br />*Ho st of elk harves t occurs off study area. <br /> <br />1II-20 <br /> <br />C01856 <br />