Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-,' <br /> <br />0067 <br /> <br />A few states allow instream uses on a discretionary basis 11/ <br />or provide that state agencies may make appropriations of <br />minimum instream flows for recreational, wildlife or other <br />purposes. .!i/ - <br /> <br />Third, when there is insufficient water to meet the needs <br />of all appropriators, priority among appropriators is established <br />chronologically, based on the time the various appropriators <br />first put the water to use, rather than based on any proration <br />that takes account of the utility of the competing uses. <br />The priority date gives an appropriative water right its <br />primary value, because it guarantees that a senior (in time) <br />appropriator will receive the entire quantity of water to <br />which he is entitled prior to delivery of any water to a <br />more junior appropriator. Originally, priority dates were <br />established on the basis of when the water was actually put <br />to use. Most western states, however, have enacted statutes <br />requiring noticing or filing of applications for new water <br />uses. In many western states, that statutory procedure is the <br />exclusive means for acquiring water rights. In these so-called <br />"permit states," priority dates are normally fixed by the <br />date of application for the water right rather than the date <br />of actual use. See 5 Clark, supra, at S 410.1. In permit <br />states, it is poSSIble that an appropriator who fails to <br />make the filings or applications required by state law but <br />actually puts the water to use may find his rights cut off <br />by a more junior appropriator who makes a timely filing. 15/ <br /> <br />Fourth, an appropriation of water is a transferable <br />right of permanent, or at least indefinite duration, pro- <br />vided the use is continued. It may be sold or transferred <br />with the land or separately. Changes in the location or nature <br />of the use (but generally not the quantity) may be permitted, <br />provided they do not injure the rights of other appropriators, <br />but in most cases must be approved in advance by the state. <br />See 5 Clark, supra, at S 4121 Trelease, "Federal-State Relations," <br />supra n.6, at 33. <br /> <br />All the western states have developed administrative <br />or judicial systems to recognize, administer and enforce water <br />rights. In most of these states, new appropriations must be <br /> <br />13/ See, e.~., Wyo. Stat. S 41-3-306 (1977)(State Engineer <br />can make aTlowances for instream stockwatering, without <br />recognizing a right to such use). <br /> <br />14/ See, e.~., Colo. Rev. Stat. S 37-92-102(3), 37-92-103(3) <br />(4) ,-rI0)-(1973) (state agency may make appropriations <br />of minimum instream flows). <br /> <br />15/ particularly where water rights may antedate water <br />codes or adjudication statutes, rights in those states may <br />in some cases be awarded priority by equity decrees or other <br />adjudicative procedures, despite a failure to make the <br />requisite filing. See 5 Clark, supra, S 410.1. <br /> <br />-11- <br />