Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~:;.......",.. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />-" <br /> <br />Federal Register I Vol. 46. No. 128 I Monday. July 6. 1981 I Notices <br /> <br />35067 <br /> <br />1. Upper Green River, The estimaled <br />average annual natural flow at the <br />outflow point of this area is about 2 maf, <br />Average annual depletions are <br />esllmaled at 317,000 acre-feel under <br />present conditions and 482.000 acre-feet <br />for future conventional uses. In 2(X)(}. <br />synfuels production would deplete <br />another 14.400 acre-feet under the <br />baseline case and 30,200 acre-feet under <br />the accelerated case, Since projected <br />synfuels development under either case <br />would require less than 2 percent of the <br />a\'erage annual outflow from this area <br />snd since the area has already <br />de\'eloped substantial water supplies <br />(Fontenelle and Flaming Gorge . <br />reservoirs). only transport facilities are <br />necessary to support water utiliz.atlon. <br />The level of future tolal depletions i. <br />well within Wyoming'. compact <br />entitlements. <br />2. Yompo River, The estlmaled <br />average annual natural flow at the <br />outflow poinl of this area is over 1.7 <br />maf. Average annual depletions are <br />estimated at 114.000 acre-feet under <br />present conditions and 181.000 acre-feet <br />for future conventional uses. Synfuel <br />production would deplete another <br />estimsted 10,500 acre-feet under the <br />accelerated case and none for the <br />baseline case. Projecled synfuels <br />development would reduce average <br />outnow from the area by less than 1 <br />percent. <br />Facility siting will probably be in the <br />Craig-Hayden area of Colorado. In this <br />area during low.flow conditions. <br />diversions may be precluded by <br />downstream senior water rights. <br />Therefore. a small amount of reservoir <br />storage, not to exceed 5,000 acre-feet of <br />active storage, would be needed. The <br />le\'el of future total depletions is within <br />compact entitlement! for the Yampa <br />River. ".- <br />J. White Ril'er. Colorado and Utah. <br />The estimated average annual natural <br />flow at the outflow point of this area is <br />568,000 acre-feet. Aversge annual <br />depletions are estimated a147,000 acre- <br />feet under present conditions and 80,000 <br />acre-feel for future conventional uses. In <br />2JXXl. synfuel production would deplete <br />another 141.000 acre-feet under tbe <br />baseline case and 240.200 acre-feet <br />under the accelerated case. There <br />presently is no compact between <br />Colorado and Utab allocating the <br />surface walers of the While Rh-er. <br />The area has a sufficienl o\-erall <br />waler supply 10 support the projected <br />le\"els of a synfuel de\'elopment. <br />Howe\-er, analysis of seuonallow <br />nows and dry }'eaN! indicates thai bolh <br />le\-8'4s of synfuels development will <br />require substantial amounts of reservoir <br />storage. <br /> <br />4. Upper Colorado Main Stem. The <br />estimated average annual naturel now <br />at the outflow point of this area is 5.7 <br />maf, Average annual depletions <br />excluding the Gunnison River drainage <br />are estimated at 991,000 acre-feet under <br />present conditions and t.ll maf for <br />future conventional uses. In 2(X)(), <br />synfuel production would deplete <br />another 28.800 acre-feel under the <br />baseline ca.e and 84,000 acre-feel under <br />the accelerated case. <br />Direct diversion. from the Colorado <br />River in the Grand Valley-DeBeque area <br />could supply the projected synfuel <br />developmenl throughout most of the <br />year. but the lupply would be subject to <br />downstream senior agricultural right.. <br />which would occasionally curtail <br />diversion. An estimated 15.000 to 35,000 <br />acre-feel of active reservoir storage <br />(depending on the synfuel development <br />le\'el} would be needed to ensure an <br />adequate lupply during these periods. <br />Waler could also be purchased from <br />Federal ft'servoirs such as the Ruedi. <br />SynIuele development below Crand <br />Junction oould utilize direct flow <br />diveN!ions, There are no specific <br />interstate compact PrQ':'isions for this <br />~., <br />5. Lower Green River. The estimated <br />average annual natural flow of this area <br />as measured at Green River. Utah. Is <br />about 5.5 maf annually and includes the <br />outflow of the Yampa and While Rivers <br />and Upper Creen River area. Average <br />annual depletions within the area are <br />estimated at 613.000 acre.feel under <br />present conditions and 691,000 acre.feet <br />. for future conventional uses. In 2000. <br />synfuels produclion would deplele <br />another 4,000 acre-feet under the <br />baseline case and 14.500 acre-feet under <br />the accelerated case. <br />Flows [q the Lower Green River are <br />also reduced by dephitlons in upstream <br />areas. the Upper Green River and the <br />While and Yampa Rivers. Depletions in <br />these upstream areas by conventional <br />uses are projected to increase from <br />478.000 acre-feet annually under present <br />conditions to 743,000 acre-feet annually <br />in 2000. Depletions by..synfuels <br />development in these upstream areas <br />are estimaled at 156.000 acre-feet <br />annually for the baseline case and <br />280.900 acre.feet annually for the <br />accelerated case. The total2JXXl <br />depletion. as measured at the outflow of <br />the Lower Green River developmenl <br />area under the accelerated case would <br />be tess than 2 million acre.feet annually <br />or aboul 35 percent of the natural flow. <br />Assumed coal gasificalion facilities in <br />Ihe development area could be located <br />close to the Green River. SinC1! the <br />lowest monthly nows exceed 30.000 <br />acre-feet. an adequate water supply <br /> <br />should be available withoul <br />.upplemental reservoir storage. <br />6. Son Juan River Colorado (llId New <br />I>fexico. The estimated average annual <br />natural now at the oulnow point of this <br />area is about 2.1 maf. Average annual <br />deplelions are estimated al382,OOO acre- <br />feel under present conditions and <br />765,000 acre-feet for future conventional <br />usell. In 2000. synfuel production would <br />deplete 63.200 acre.feet under the <br />baseline case and 62,200 acre-feet under <br />Ihe accelerated case. <br />Navajo Reservoir has over 48.000 <br />acre-feet of water for sale. An additional <br />35,000 acre-feet has already been <br />contracted for a proposed coal <br />gasification facility. Developments sited <br />in New Mexico would probsbly <br />purchase water supplies from the <br />Navajo Reservoir. The 12.000 acre. feet <br />needed In Colorado could be obtained <br />from the Piedra. Los Pinos. Florida. <br />Animas. or La Plata RiveN!, with some <br />storage necessary on all bUI the Animas. <br />The total depletions In New Mexico <br />under the accelerated case <br />(conventional use.. synfuels <br />development. and New Mexico's share <br />of CRSP reservoir evaporation) will <br />approximate Ihe amount of water <br />available to New ~texico under <br />provisions of the Upper Basin Compect <br />and with conservative hydrologiC <br />interpretation of waters available to the <br />Upper Basin under provisions of the <br />Colorado River Compact. <br />7. Upper Basin Supplies. Operation <br />studies using the Colorado River System <br />Simulation Model Indicate that with <br />Upper Basin depletions for conventional <br />uses and CRSP evaporation of 5.17 <br />million acre-feet annually in 2(X)(}, and <br />with the annual 441,000 acre-feet <br />consumptive use requirements of the <br />accelerated case. the expected outflow <br />from the nasin at Lees Ferry. Arizona. <br />would exceed 9.6 million acre-feet. <br />Moreover. the studics found that there <br />was alleast a 50 percent probability <br />that the outnow in 2000 would exceed <br />8_23 million acre-feet. These findings <br />indicate that synfuels de\'elopmcnl in <br />the Upper Basin would not be <br />constrained by the Colorado Rh'er <br />Compact. at least up to the levels of <br />development projected in the <br />accelerated case. The operation studies <br />assumed current U.S_ Department of the <br />Inlerior criteria for operation of CRSP <br />reservoirs and other elements of the <br />"Law of the River." <br />Water allocations of the Upper Basin <br />Compact may constrain synfuels <br />de\'elopment in individual Upper Basin <br />States. The situation in Ihe San Juan <br />R!\'er development area with respect to <br />New Mexico has been mentioned. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />0378 <br />