Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />The reconnaissance report of February 1963 presented a complex <br />plan which included combination of storage rights of Greeley's <br />mountain reservoirs, regulation through exchange of city allotments <br />from the Colorado-Big Thompson Project, abandonment of some plains <br />irrigation reservoirs, and transfer of such plains storage rights <br />to upstream Cache la Foudre Unit reservoirs, Enhancement of the <br />available irrigation water supply would accrue through reduction <br />of seepage losses from intake canals, addition to storage by provi- <br />sion of replacement capacity lost through sedimentation, and savings <br />of water by reduction of evaporation, <br /> <br />As the' studies proceeded, questions arose concerning: (1) whether <br />supplemental irrigation water was urgently needed, and could be justi- <br />fied, and (2) the practicability of plains reservoir consolidation- <br />transfer, and the willingness of their owners to participate, Numer- <br />ous other problems were also encountered in attempting to devise <br />procedures for practical application of the plains reservoir consoli- <br />dation-transfer plans, <br /> <br />It was concluded that the total irrigated area in the Cache la <br />Poudre basin had facilities and water supplies ample to meet an <br />average of 95 percent of their theoretical requirements, The limited <br />need for supplemental irrigation water probably could be met almost <br />entirely by conservation measures and cooperative efforts of local <br />interests, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Further analysis also was made of the municipal and industrial <br />water supplies and requirements for Fort Oollins and Greeley, The <br />population projections made by the cities were utilized, although <br />independent projections resulted in considerably lower estimates, <br />Both cities have a policy of requiring new annexations to provide <br />and assign rights for minimum suppl~es of water per acre of land, <br />The analysis was based upon the population projections by the cities, <br />a per capi~a requirement of 250 gallons of water daily, the full <br />exercise of all presently owned water rights, and the new water <br />rights accruing from the annexation policy, That analysis indicated <br />that both cities would have adequate water until at least the year <br />2010 if the preceding basic assumptions are met, If their popula- <br />tion prOjections should prove to be optimistic, the need for <br />additional water would not arise for a longer period of time, <br />The extent to which additional hold-over or regulatory storage <br />might be needed was not studied in detail; however, either or <br />both cities should be able to finance such improvements without <br />hardship, <br /> <br />AlthOugh the probable adequacy of a future municipal and <br />industrial water supply was a consideration, economics constituted <br />the most important single element leading to the decision to <br />terminate the investigations, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />