My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06790
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06790
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:22 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:52:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.B
Description
UCRBRIP Annual Reports
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1999
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
1998 Annual Reports Package (incomplete) Part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />enlarged storage reservoir is recommended, this project must be funded through FY 2000 to <br />provide the means by which to evaluate alternatives and develop a coherent management <br />plan for the Yampa River. Potential benefits of such a plan go well beyond the Yampa <br />River Basin, The Yampa provides spawning habitat for endangered fish, such as razorback <br />sucker and Colorado pikeminnow (fonnerly Colorado squawfish), which disperse to not <br />only the Yampa, but also the Green and White rivers, It also provides spring peak flows <br />otherwise absent from the Green River since Flaming Gorge Dam was constructed, Spring <br />floods create quiet backwaters which serve as nursery habitat for these species, Therefore, <br />maintenance of a "natural" flow regime in the Y ampa could have significant implications <br />for the operation of Flaming Gorge Dam and the viability of nursery habitats within the <br />Green River downstream from its confluence with the Yampa, If we cannot protect the <br />relatively pristine Yampa River from the same impacts that already imperil native fishes in <br />the mainstem Colorado and Green rivers, how can we ever hope to recover these species? <br />A commitment to a Yampa management plan by the Recovery Program would demonstrate <br />its support for a collaborative process which can serve as a model for other subbasins in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin, <br /> <br />VIII, Project Status: Due to delays in hiring a Coordinator and completing the fish flow report, <br />the project is about 6 months behind schedule, In FY 98, funding for Task 5 was reduced <br />by $49K from $92K to $43K, and funding for Task 6 ($4IK) was eliminated, Funding <br />approved for FY 99 was limited to $125K for Task 5, $31,600 for Task 12 and $40K for <br />Task 14 (through completion of Task 5 in March 1999), The decision to fund Tasks 6 and <br />7 and the balance of Task 14 ($40K) was deferred, pending completion of Task 5 in March <br />1999, However, Task 5 may not be completed before June 1999, So additional funds for <br />Task 14 (program Management) may be needed regardless of the decision to proceed, <br />Even if approved and funded, it is doubtful that Tasks 6 and 7 will be completed in FY 99, <br />But that should not influence the decision to fund these tasks, If necessary, funding and <br />workload for these tasks could be carried over to FY 2000, The RIPRAP schedule calls for <br />completion ofNEPA documents, ROD and Implementation Agreement in September 2000, <br />If the project continues beyond FY 99, a more realistic target date would be January 2001, <br /> <br />CAP-9, Yampa O&M Plan - Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.