WSP06758

• File Number: 8507
• Description: Rio Grande Project
• State: CO
• Basin: Rio Grande
• Date: 8/1/1982
• Title: Buffalo Peaks Wilderness Study Area Report - Pike & San Isabel National Forests
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES

This chapter outlines environmental effects that would result
from implementing the two alternatives under consideration.
It is based on the analysis of the affected environment
discussed in Chapter III. The first section describes
environmental consequences as they relate to individual
resources, and the second section deals with overall
wilderness suitability.

A. Physical and Biological Effects

1. Wilderness Resource

The suitable alternative, if acted on by Congress,
would add 56,950 acres to the National Wilderness
Preservation System. Although this would add
additional acres to the Wilderness system, no unique
land forms or ecosystems would be added which are
not currently represented.

.
~

;,

The unsuitable alternative would initially preclude
adding the WSA to the 'National Wilderness
Preservation System. The area would be managed for
uses as set forth in the Forest Plan.

;/
,
r;:
;,

;;
~~',

Regardless of the
wilderness character
until Congress makes
recommendation.

f

selected alternative, the
of the WSA will be maintained
the final decision on the

t~:

,"
.~
;
.,~

2.

Geology and Soils

~
:~;
~;~
',!

The landforms and soils will not be affected
directly by either alternative. Increased potential
for mineral activity and vegetation manipulation
activities with the unsuitable alternative could
impact the soils within the project area.
Mitigation measures would be specified to maintain
the impacts within acceptable limits.

~>.'
~~
~
;~
;:,~
t~
';
.;)

Soils are conducive to timber growth and vegetation
treatment for water production and wildlife habitat
maintenance and improvements.

"',-"'

~;

....:'

43

r~2839