My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06750
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/1/1996
Author
USFS
Title
Aspen Highlands Ski Area - Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Aspen HighiillUU 51i Ar"" - Draft Environme",a} 1mpa<:/5/01"""'''' <br />undermined several large trees. The water flow on the steep (-80 percent or 400) slopes above and below the <br />catwalk entrained enough debris to be classified as a debris flow (pierson and Costa 1987). and resulted in debris <br />deposition for a distance of at least 480 feet on a gently-sloping bencb about 100 feet downslope from the <br />catwalk. <br /> <br />On the steep, sparsely vegetated slopes east of Maroon Creek and ex.tending 1.800 feet downstream from the <br />channel associated with June 15 failure. several colluvium slab failures lI'ansformed into small debris flows. and <br />deposited small cones of debris at the edge of the floodplain. Given the steep. bare. unstable nature of this <br />hilIslope, rapid infllll'ation from local snowpack melting may have triggered these small slides. although on the <br />upper parts of the slopes saturation could have been increased by infiltration from the June 15 debris flow. <br />Another recent landslide can be observed 1,200 to 2.100 feet upstream of the June 15 erosion gully. The depth <br />of the thin colluvium, compared to the slide thickness. suggests that more than superficial debris may have been <br />involved with this slide. The possibility of bedrock landsliding on this oversteepened valley wall is also <br />supported by atypical topography. northeast of the head of this slide. Immediately downslope from the northwest <br />margin of the lower Moment of Truth lI'ail, numerous bedrock ridges and swales nearly parallel contours. These <br />atypicallandfarms. whicb cannot be ex.plained by normal erosion along the strike of nonresistant beds. occur at <br />the head of an unfailed portion of slOpe between the large landslide described above. and a similar zone of failures <br />below the Moment of Truth Catwalk. Based on these landforms. and the presence of two flanking areas that have <br />failed in recent geological time. this area may contain potential slope instability. <br /> <br />Golden Barrel Slides <br />Two small landslides occurred in lune of 1995 just east of the Golden Barrel Trail. between elevations of 8.900 <br />to 9.000 feet. The smaller slide is a 9 to 13-foot-high slump along an abandoned road. The slump deposit is <br />about 10 feet wide. about 80 feet long. and instead of crossing the road it turned to flow down it. The bulk of <br />this deposit is contained in a relatively inlacl mass immediately below the failed roadcut. while the rest of the slide <br />deposit is contained in a long tongue of debris that flowed down the old road in a northeasterly directio,n. <br />Downslope of the old road is a classic colluvium debris slide that mobilized into a debris flow. Debris slides of <br />this type are generally attributed to the buildup of a perched water table in the permeable colluvium or regolith <br />overlying less permeable bedrock, whicb results from rapid infi1ll'ation of rainfall or snowmelt. The debris slide <br />scar is 35 feet wide. 40 feet long. 4.5 to 5.5 feet deep and occurred on a 75 percent (370) slope. Downslope <br />(northwest), the slide scar narrows to an 8-foot-wide "throat" aod then widens into a debris fan deposited on the <br />relatively flat ski run. Beyond this primary toe. a more liquid debris flow extends northeast for about 125 feet. <br /> <br />The proximate cause of both the Golden Barrel slides appears to be a ditch consll'Ucted in 1994. whicb collects <br />water from a large area above the base of the Exhibition n Lift and discharges it into the forest east of the Golden <br />Barrel Trail. The flow path of this ditcb water can be traced downslope to just east of the site of the roadcut <br />slump, and approximately upslope of the debris slide. Adjacent unfailed slopes were able to maintain stability, <br />despite the rapid melt of snowpack, because there was no concentrated source of surface water to cause complete <br />regolith saturation. In the Leadville family of soils found in this area. higher clay content presumably limited <br />permeability and inhibited lI'ansport of the high volumes of inflltrating ditch water. whicb then resulted in high <br />water pore pressures and slab failure. <br /> <br />DEBRIS FLOWS <br />The existence of continuous alluvial fans and debris fans at the base of the upper Aspen Highlands ridge proves <br />that these fans. and the slopes above them. have been subject to debris flows and debris avalanches. In Figure <br />3.1. all alluvial and debris fans have been depicted as debris-flow prone and debris-avalanche prone slopes. This <br />underestimates the areal extent of the debris-flow and debris-avalanche processes in the source zones and in <br />intermediary channels. Under extreme precipitation. almost aoy colluvium mapped in a drainage basin fronted <br />by an alluvial fan could be mobilized into a debris flow. <br /> <br />3-6 <br /> <br />Geology aM Soil. <br />Gt!ologic HozOTtU <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.