Laserfiche WebLink
<br />As~n HigJrlands S/cj Area - Draft En'rJironmenlal Impact Stalemenl <br />Table 2.6 Continued <br /> <br />Discipline Impacts Potential Mitigation <br /> Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C <br />SCENIC Since Maroon Bowl would not be <br />RESOURCES developed. it would noL be visible <br />(Continued) from any viewpoint and the Loge <br /> Bowl Catwalk also would oat be <br /> readilv visible, <br />LAND USE Since \he Forest Service SUP Since not all of the area covered by the Maroon Bowl would be excluded None proposed. <br /> designates Aspen Highlands as a SUP has been developed for \he from \he SUP area under <br /> recrca1ion area with skiing as a designated recreation land use, the Alternative C. and expansion of ski <br /> main activity, and there are no expansion proposed for undeveloped facilities into \he undeveloped areas <br /> mining. logging. or grazing segments is in compliance with the would be in compliance with the <br /> activiries, there would be no targeted land use. Expansion in these Ianduse designated uoder \he SUP. <br /> negative impacl on land use areas would not conflict with any other There would not be any conflicts <br /> activities under the No Action land uses since none exist with other land uses wilhin this <br /> Alternative, area. <br /> <br />2-32 <br /> <br />Comparison of Alternati'rJes <br />