My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06750
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06750
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:24:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:50:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.765
Description
White River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
9/1/1996
Author
USFS
Title
Aspen Highlands Ski Area - Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />/ <br /> <br />Table 2,6 Co",j.ud <br /> <br />Clr.aptrr 2 . The AltenuJlives <br />Q <br /><';';l <br />1-' <br />w.:> <br />t....:l <br />-.1 <br /> <br />Discipline Impacts Polenlial Mitigation <br /> Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C <br />BIO-DIVERSITY clearing could also affect genetic The number of forest patches species during breeding period would be minimized <br />(Continued) diversity by altering the ratio of would increase by 63 (20%) by limiting conslrUction 10 after July 15. and pbasing <br /> individuals of edge-tolcranl/forest- relative to the No Action c.onstruclion of differenllift pods over a number of <br /> interior species, and reducing habitat Allemalive (almost all in the 0-5 years, <br /> evenness. acre block size), <br /> The resulting change in spacial Alt.emative C could more severely <br /> configurations between habitat blocks fragment potential old-growth <br /> could produce genetic isolatiotl in some spruce-fir slands (wbicb tend 10 <br /> species. harbor more species than young - <br /> growth) between Highland Bowl <br /> and Sleeplechase lifts and along the <br /> egress route below Steeplechase <br /> Lift. <br /> Another difference could be <br /> inlroduction of exotic species when <br /> revegetating the Ridge and <br /> Hi.hland surface lifts, <br />AQUATIC There would be no additional No fIsheries exist in the composite on- Since the Steeplechase catwalk. is Forest Service BMPs for erosion control must be <br />RESOURCES impact to on-mountain streams rior mountain Maroon Creek and Castle excluded from AlLernalive C, adhered to minimize the sedimentation impacts on <br /> to Castle Creek, but intermittent Creek. sub-watersheds. Howe'ier, invertebmte impacts in the CCW. aquatic resources. <br /> sedimenlation of Maroon Creek construction of the Sleeplecha.se B I would be lower than under <br /> could occur following high Catwalk across the CCW-BI sub- Alternative B. Design and consuuct 8 drainage system using Forest <br /> precipitation events or heavy watershed could affect benthic macro- Service BMPs. <br /> snowmelt in early spring. This invertebrate communities in the stream. Increased seasonal water yields <br /> could negatively impact resident In addition. increased water yields could would be lower than under The stream CCW-Bl would be cuJverted at the <br /> rainbow and cutthroat trout and increase erosion and sediment input into Alternative B due to less proposed Sleeplechase Catwalk crossing. <br /> macro invertebrates. Maroon Creek and could increase the snowmaking and the subsequent <br /> likelihood of persislent sediment inputs decrease in the likelihood of <br /> Sedimentation of Maroon Creek inID the Roaring Fork River from sedimentation and water yield <br /> could produce shon-l<mI effects on Maroon Creek. whicb could affect impacts on invertebrates in Maroon <br /> the Roaring furl< River. fisheries in these rivers. and Castle creeks and the Roaring <br /> Fork River. <br /> Net annual water depletions for While net annual water depletion for <br /> snowmaking wouJd not advC7Sely snowmaking would be grell1er than <br /> impact aquatic resources. under the Alternative A. this is likely 10 <br /> have 1in1e effect on aquatic resources in <br /> Maroon Creek. <br /> <br />Comparison of Alu-rnativu <br /> <br />2-25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.