Laserfiche WebLink
<br />on~Jl <br /> <br />lfl,(~~;~\;!;'i;,~t~ltj:ll,~'~;;;;,!;(;1;ij~~~;ill\i;;;j~(~j;li~;"lfi.FiCIE:;;;;\~~l;j;~;~lil'I(;;!lllii~;!;;~i;~!~!;~!!r~~i~ll;:li'l~l!I;'IJ!~; <br /> <br />This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) contains information about activities and resulting <br />enviromnental effects associated with developments in the Aspen Highlands Ski Area. These developments are <br />aimed at expanding and improving the recreation experi= provided by the reson. The information is organized <br />to facilitate consideration of these effects by the public and by the Forest Supervisor, who is responsible for <br />deciding whether or not to approve the proposal put forward by the Aspen Skiing Company or alternatives to this <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Understanding the structure of this document is crucial to an overall understanding of the information required <br />in an EIS. The following provides an overview of the components of this document. <br /> <br />Summary - The shon summary accompanying this Draft EIS provides a concise overview of the information, <br />analyses, tables, and figures presented in the body of the document. <br /> <br />Abbreviations - A list of abbreviations used in the document follows this preface. <br /> <br />Table of Contents - Table of coments are provided at two levels of detail. An overall table of contents, showing <br />the chapter headings and ftrSt order of subheadings within each chapter, is presented at the beginning of the <br />document. A more detailed table of contents with up to four orders of subheadings is presented at the beginning <br />of chapters I through 4. "Footers" at the bottom of each page are keyed to first and second order subheadings <br />to help readers track their location in the document. Lists of tables and figures included in each chapter are <br />included in each detailed table of contents. <br /> <br />Chapter 1- Purpose and Need - Chapter 1 describes the purpose and need for the proposal and its scope of <br />analysis. It briefly defines the NEPA process. describes the project area and background, and establishes agency <br />involvement and decisions to be made. The fmal sections describe scoping and other public involvement <br />activities and lists approvals and permits that may be required. <br /> <br />Chapter 2 - The Proposed Action and Alternatives - Chapter 2 includes a description of "No Action" <br />(Alternative A). the action proposed by the Aspen Skiing Company (Alternative B). and the Forest Service <br />preferred alternative to the proposed action (Alternative C). The potential environmental impacts of these <br />alternatives on various rcsowces and potmtial mitigation measures to alleviate these impacts are also summarized <br />at the end of this chapter. <br /> <br />Chapter 3 - The Affected Environment - Otapter 3 describes current physical, biological. social, and economic <br />conditions within the area of influence of the proposed action. This information provides the baseline for <br />assessing and comparing the potential impacts of the alternatives, This chapter is subdivided into 16 resource <br />arelW'disciplines. 1bis allows readers to target those resources or disciplines of greatest interest to them. It also <br />allows readers to compare information presented in Olapter 4 with corresponding "current conditions" presented <br />in this chapter. <br /> <br />Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences - Chapter 4 provides a comprehensive scientific and analytic <br />comparison of the potential environmental impacts of alternatives B and C, relative to the No Action Alternative. <br />In order to facilitate comparison of information provided in chapters 3 and 4. this chapter is subdivided into the <br />same 16 resource area/discipline subsections as those used in Chapter 3. Using the baseline established in <br />Chapter 3. each subsection in Chapter 4 details the possible direct. indirect. and cumulative effects of each <br />alternative. Each subsection also provides a series of potential mitigation measures that could be implemented <br />to alleviate possible impacts. each provides an analysis of the level of compliance of each alternative with the <br />Forest Plan, and each provides an assessment of the unavoidable impacts of implementing each alternative. The <br /> <br />Hi <br />