Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ", ,', """:':""rtISTOFTABI..ES" ," <br /> <br />Page <br />Table 2.1. Components of the No Action Alternative approved in 1994 .......................... 2-2 <br />Table 2.2. Description of new ski lifts for Alternative B. ...................................... 2-6 <br />Table 2.3. Description of new ski lifts for Alternative C. ..................................... 2-13 <br />Table 2.4. Area of skiable polygons, area of skiable terrain within these polygons, and areas of <br />different types of skiable terrain for Alternatives A, B and C. .................... 2-17 <br />Table 2.5. Skiable terrain capacity, lift pod capacity, practical mountain capacity, initial access <br />capacity and base area delivery capacity for Alternatives A, B and C. ........ . . . . .. 2-18 <br />Table 2.6. Summary of impacts of full-scale alternatives and potential mitigation. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. 2-19 <br /> <br />,..,.'. .,cc'.','.....', ',..,......\...,....'.c...,...,.'.'..'.,.,..,..,.,.'.\L.IS'1"OF.FIGURES'..i'..',.'.....,i ",',,',' <br /> <br />Page <br />Figure 2.1. Alternative A - No Action ..................................................... 2-4 <br />Figure 2.2. Aspen Highlands Base Area Development ........................................ 2-5 <br />Figure 2.3. Alternative B - Proposed Action ..............,................................. 2-8 <br />Figure 2.4. Alternative C - Preferred Alternative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . : . . . . . . . . . .. 2-12 <br /> <br />2-ii <br /> <br />Table ofColllellls <br />