Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,e <br />I <br />,I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.,. <br /> <br />ments, QS long es they ?rcCead ana exorcise due diligence, ~s <br /> <br />we heve ~t all times. <br /> <br />lB. ROOVER: You rather object to a conrpc.ct? <br />tffi. FIEID: . We went to retain all the rights vie he.ve. <br />IiR. HOOVER: Sup~ose !:.Her doduct~ng the two ['Jld a half <br />million [',cre-feet from the total, thl'.t Jeing suffioient :for <br />your needs, eleven million C.ore-feet ramc,in unused, would you <br />consider giving sor,~ concession on th2.t mc.rgin, if you oen <br />h2.ve 2ssur2,nce in c. oo;n:'l2.ct of rights be.sed on prior use? <br />Iffi. FIE]]): Assurcno e migh 1; be 0:11 some v::"l ue. <br />1-iR. HOOVER: You 2XO mvere the".; Colorado initi::tted.this com- <br />miss ion becc.use 0;: intorferonc e ;md long oontinued Ii tfgp.t ion <br />['.nd expense with rege.:rd to hc'l: wc.ter rights? <br />MR. FIE1D~ Yes sir. <br />MR. HOOVER: Do you think some kind of e com~c.ct could be <br />entered into ~hereby it would cle~r tho ctmosphere and freo <br />Colorc.do of long continued litigction, Qovelopmont? <br />Yes sir. But might it not ~:Jrevent development? <br />You do not believe c.ny such compo,ct would be <br /> <br /> .ME. ?IEID: <br /> HR. HOOVER: <br />of !:.ny use? <br /> fIR. PI E]]) : <br /> <br />I would prefer to tcke my chences without it; I <br />would ~)cse it on our needs wlo.ere \"Ie do not in 2.ny !n2-l1i1er recog- <br />nize ri;c.ri~n rights for ~lY ?urpose, but recognize ap):ropric- <br />hon of we-ter, uni:.er the lc.ws of necessity. <br />HR. HeaVE,,: Would you consideI' raising any o'ujoctions to <br />these works 011 the lower riveT? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />\. <br />