Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />L <br />[ <br />c: <br />! <br />( <br />L1 <br />C <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />( <br />( <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br />[ <br /> <br />matrix form to allow a quick environmental comparison of <br />each alternative. The advantages and disadvantages associ- <br />ated with each alternative are presented for six environ- <br />mental areas of consideration. Details in four of the six <br />areas are presented in each alternative chapter. The eval- <br />uation of recreational/ cultural resources and aesthetic <br />considerations is similar for each alternative and there- <br />fore is discussed in general in Appendix H. Following <br />these tables is a brief summary of each alternative, in- <br />cluding descriptions, location, features, costs, and salin- <br />ity effectiveness. Alternatives 7 and 8 are treated as one <br />alternative since both are dependent upon each other for a <br />complete alternative. Alternatives using water for indus- <br />trial purposes do not include any industry costs nor any <br />cost-sharing by industry. <br /> <br />r- <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />/1.) - ... , ", <br /><J'.'...lv( <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />1-6 <br /> <br />[ <br />