My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06677
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06677
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:52 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:48:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.112
Description
Dallas Creek Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1975
Title
News Articles / Press Releases
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />\Y\cn-TrD"''''- Qo.:.\\\ Prc-~~ <br /> <br />\ 2 - 2 <- - Itp <br /> <br />RECEIVED <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />District voters OK repayment contract 9.1 <br />Dam construction start next September seen <br /> <br />(' <br /> <br /> <br /> mr r" gl:: ~I:" !r" ll'i':: 2"" ~i" gor:: ii:: ~~ If fi ~ <br /> 1- ~ ~'" !~ t; '" <br /> ~-Pl . m ,,!~ "~m 3!'l ,,~~ hl'l Iirf~ ia <br /> " " llllS! ~. .. <br /> -'2 rI~ isz !z ez :l:z Ii ~ <br /> ~f~ . z az . z fg fg <br /> iF~ i.~ I:~ I~ .'~ !i~ if~ iQ . ~ !i <br /> ~N ..~.. !'" :1:... q.. ~ q <br /> :I:~ '" .~ II .. go::; q <br /> J! .~ i ,. . <br /> ! 1 q <br />YES 80 55 828 678 728 423 923 524 478 375 1 80 24 5,l97 <br />,.NO 148 25 113 72 116 42 34 15 16 11 7 13 1 613 <br /> <br />DALLAS VOTE TABULATION shows strong support for the repayment contract from all <br />but one ofthe 10 Tri-County Water Conservancy District precincts. The contract, for repay- <br />ment of $28 million of ,the estimated $54 million cost of the project, was approved <br />overwhelmingly by voters in Montrose and Delta counties, and voters in Ouray County were <br />against the contract by a narrow margin. <br /> <br />By BILL HAGGERTY <br />Daily Press Staff Writer <br />The Dallas Creek Project repayment <br />schedule passed by almost a 9-1 margin <br />yesterday, with voter turnout heavier than <br />any other special election in recent memory <br />in the area. <br />Tbe schedule for construction of the <br />Ridgway Dam was outlined by a Bureau of <br />Reclamation spokesman in a telephone in- <br />terview tbis morning. <br />According to Dick Cummings from the <br />bureau construction headquarters in Mon- <br />trose, the bureau has.continued its plans for <br />~onstruction 01 the dam, and speCifications <br />for a field office, 10 be built in Ridgway. <br />should go out in February. <br />Specifications for construction of the <br />Dam will probably go out in June, accor- <br />ding 10 Cummings, witb construction to <br />begin hopefully in September, 1977, nine <br />months from now. <br />AlOtal of 5,811 persons cast ballots yester- <br />day in parts of Montrose, Delta and Ouray <br />counties to decide on the repayment <br />schedule. One ballot was illegible in Delta <br />county. <br />; 01 that total tbere were 5,197 votes in <br />favor of the repayment schedule and 613 <br />:votes against. <br />. Only one precinct out of 10 voted against <br />,the project. That was precinct I, the <br /> <br />Oddfellows Hall in Ridgway, where the vote <br />was 148 against the project andSOinfavor. <br />The only other precinct that was even <br />close was Precinct 2, Grange Hall in <br />COlona, where the vote was 55 in favor ofthe <br />re-payment schedule and 25 against. <br />According to voter officials in Ridgway, <br />voter turn-out was lighter than expected in <br />Ouray county. Total figures for the county <br />show a close race, though, with 136 votes in <br />favor of the schedule and 180 votes against. <br />Those totals include absentee ballots from <br />Ouray. <br />In Montrose County, where voter turnout <br />was unexpectedly high, all precincts voted <br />heavily in favor ofthe repayment schedule. <br />The vote county wide, shows 3,660 votes in <br />favor and only 390 votes against. <br />The widest margin of victory in Montrose <br />county was in Precinct 7. Fireman's Hall in <br />OIathe, where the vote was 923 in favor and <br />34 against, a margin of about 27 to one. <br />In Delta county, the vote was also heavily <br />in favor of the project, even more so than in <br />Montrose County. <br />Vote tally in that county shows 1,401 votes <br />in favor of the project and only 43 against it. <br />That is a margin of about 32 to one. Widest <br />margin of victory in that county was in <br />Precinct 8, the courthouse in Delta, which <br />showed a vote of 524 in favor of the project <br />and 15 against. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.