Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Dl:'a.~p'age !lAd. ?1J,p,tI;I\H'Op, Dhtil'~t req.ile~ted tbe:b the Corps in:t1l:l.ate <br /> <br />ll'Q~d:t~e; to p!t'ovi'de r.Lood protect~on to~ the cOIlllllu.ni'ty u.nder Section <br /> <br />I: <br />205 of theF~ood Contro~ Act Gf 1948,' IJ,s~ended, which reads as <br /> <br />fo~'l,owa ; <br /> <br />liThe SeoretlJ,!t'Y' Of the ~ ;ts 'hell'll'bY' ,!\~thoirized to Il.llot <br />from allY appropriat:tons her~tofore: o~ hereafter made for <br />t'l,ood oont!t'ol, not to exceed $25,000',000 fer anyone <br />fisoal year, fo.. the oonst1'~ction of small projeots fol:' <br />flood oontrol and .I'elated PU't'poseeinot speo:l:f1oll.l1y auth", <br />o!t'ized by Congress, which comes, W1thin the provision of. <br />Seotion 1 of the Flood Cont"ol Aot: of' .Tune 22, 1936, <br />when in the opinion of the Chief o~ ~ginellrs such work <br />is' advisable I, Provided, that not mo..e than $1,000,000 <br />shall be allotted undeI' th:l.s seotion to.. a ,projeot 'at <br />anY' s'ingle looality and the amount' allotted. shall be <br />sufficient to complete Fede..al partioipation on the <br />p..ojeotj p!r'ovided :f'u!r'ther, that th" p!r'ovietions speoified <br />in Section 3 of the Flood Cont!r'ol Aot of' Ju.ne 22, 1936, <br />ae a.rnended,.shall applYl and provi!ied further that the ' <br />work shall be oomplete in itself and not oommit the United <br />Ste.tes to e.ny e.dditionll.l imp1'ovements to insure its suc~ <br />cessful ope!r'ation, exoept as may reeult from the normal <br />procedures e.pplying to projects authorized after sub~ <br />m$s,s1:on of pre1imina..y llXa.rnination' and survey reports." <br /> <br />Tlle detailed study and tll1s ..eporti a!r'e based upon the ab~ve,.. <br />~elit~oned!r'equesll f!r'om, loce.l inte!r'este'. Authority for preparation <br /> <br />of ,this Detailed P!r'oject Report was granted by the Office, Chief of <br />Engineers on 15 Novembe.. 1971. <br /> <br />SCO?~ OF TH~ STUDX <br /> <br />The study' addressee tlle flood a,nd va.ter related problems at HQ1ly, <br />CO'l,ora.do a,seocia.ted. vtth tlls ~ld HO!r'se C!t'eek, Two Butte Creek and <br />,A,rkansll,1l' River wa.te:\,sheds and the po1lep,llh,l fOll' 1l01ving thell\, All <br /> <br />ll'ea,sonable alterpative ~l~n~ to solve the flood problems were con~ <br />s~ered in depth and det~i~ commenauratewfth the objective of selecting . <br />th~ most suitable plan and determining' its feasibility, considering <br /> <br />2 <br />