Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />nr'1<j O')C'j <br />Ul} .J.~~.J ,-,,'. <br /> <br />modification is controversial, both among the water users <br />withi n the target areas (what benefits some users may be <br />detrimental to others) and with those downwind from the <br />target areas who often believe that precipitation in their <br />areas may be decreased. For these reasons, it is not antici- <br />pated that weather modifi cat i on wi 11 become a si gnifi cant <br />factor for High Plains agriculture for the foreseeable <br />future. <br /> <br />Research and app 1 i ed results to-date show suffi ci ent promi se <br />for the future to justify a continuing research and develop- <br />ment program. An extensi ve and comprehensi ve weather modi- <br />fication research program called the High Plains Cooperative <br />Program (or HIPLEX) was initiated in 1973 as a cooperative <br />federal/state project "to develop a practical scientifically <br />sound, and socially acceptable technology for precipitation <br />management applicable to convective cloud systems in the <br />High Plains Region of the United States". The U.S. Bureau <br />of Reclamation in cooperation with other federal agencies, <br />the affected states and local organi zati ons admi ni sters the <br />HIPLEX program as part of the overall Project Skywater. <br /> <br />Research and fi e 1 d tests on HIPLEX technology are underway <br />in three High Plains locations: Big Spring, Texas; Goodland, <br />Kansas; and Miles City, Montana. These sites were chosen to <br />represent respectively the southern, central and northern <br />High Plains environments. Research to date has had mixed <br />results at the three test sites. Seeding of summertime <br />(growing season) convective cloud systems to increase effec- <br />tive precipitation has not been very successful. Hail <br />suppression and other violent weather reduction programs <br />have been more effective and have been commercially imple- <br />mented in several Hi gh Pl ai ns areas. Favorable cost-benefit <br /> <br />7 <br />