Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Hi gh Pl ai ns i rri gators have long recogni zed the importance of water <br />management in thei r farm enterpri ses. The extent of i ncorporati on of best <br />available practices in the Baseline is a significant measure of that aware- <br />ness. The methods of local water supply augmentation showing most promise <br />for the area were examined qual Hatively by the General Contractor, and are <br />described briefly below. Some of the on-farm practices described are prac- <br />ticed or may be available as measures to achieve enhanced irrigation and land <br />management effi ci encies. However, because they al so contri bute to recharge <br />and/or conservation of runoff, they are included here as local augmentation <br />possibil Hies. <br /> <br />The principal assumption underlying Strategy Three was that water demand <br />reduction strategies (MS-l and 2) would not fully meet subregional, regional, <br />or national goals for agricultural production and related economic growth and <br />vitality. Therefore, purposeful water supply augmentation developments at the <br />local level should be investigated. These include weather or precipitation <br />modification (to the extent not already in practice as might be reflected in <br />the Baseline), water banking, water harvesting, vegetative and evaporation <br />management, and other methods either on-farm or multi-farm, watershed or <br />subregional scales. This option in the array of water management changes <br />injected into the analysis could take the form of actions by farmers, local <br />water management districts, state agencies, or the federal government, or some <br />combination of private and public sector programs. <br /> <br />Some local augmentation methods are already being implemented by indivi- <br />dual farmers, e.g., conjunctive use of playa waters. Others would requi re <br />initiatives, participation and/or funding support by local, state or federal <br />agencies. Weather modification and desalinization programs are good examples <br />of the latter. Any of these programs al ready authorized and available are <br />included in the Baseline projections, particularly those available for adop- <br />tion by individual farmers at their own discretion. Programs which require <br />regional or subregional publicly sponsored action (e.g. desalination) were <br />considered as new programs for analysis. A brief summary of assessed water <br />supply augmentation methods and thei r potential for future use in the High <br />Plains Region follows: <br />