My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06657
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06657
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:47:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.120.90.B
Description
7 Basin States/10 Tribes
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/28/1991
Author
State of California
Title
Conceptual Approach for Reaching Basin States Agreement on Interim Operation of Colorado River System Reservoirs, California's Use of Colorado Riber Water Above its Basic Apportionment and Implementa
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CONCEPTUAL APPROACH <br />for <br />REACHING BASIN STATES AGREEMENT <br />on <br />INTERIM OPERATION OF COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM RESERVOIRS, <br />CALIFORNIA'S USE 01" COLORADO RIVER WATER <br />ABOVE ITS BASIC APPORTIONMENT, <br />and <br />IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INTERSTATE WATER BANK <br /> <br />I. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />Although the reservoir system on the Colorado River has been <br />drawn down since July 1987 for a variety of reasons, over 40 maf of <br />water remains in active storage. California's position has been <br />that the average annual runoff within the Colorado River Basin <br />exceeds the average annual depletions by 1.8 maf suggesting that a <br />surplus condition on the Colorado River does exist. In fact, <br />within the next five years there is about a 37 percent chance of <br />anticipatory flood releases J:>eing made from Lake Mead. Also, <br />studies conducted by the Bureau of Reclamation indicate that the <br />current storage in the Upper Basin is significantly above that <br />amount required to meet the 602 (a) storage requirement and the <br />storage in the Lower Basin is above that amount required to meet <br />delivery obligations to Mexico and the basic apportionment of each <br />of the Lower Division states. <br /> <br />However, with the Colorado River System reservoirs being drawn <br />down, the other Basin states have been reluctant to agree to <br />supporting California's requests for Colorado River water totalling <br />5.2 maf, even though technical studies have shown that those <br />requests could be met without causing any increase in the chance of <br />a shortage to any Colorado River water user between now and any <br />reasonable foreseeable date in the future. It is those states' <br />position that as there is no risk of future shortage, California <br />should indemnify those states against the possibility of a <br />shortage. As a result, discussions by the other Basin States have <br />turned away from the technical studies and the process and <br />procedures for guiding development of the annual operating plans <br />and have focused on California's use of water above its basic <br />apportionment of 4.4 maf per year, how California intends to reduce <br />its use of Colorado River water, and how California intends to <br />provide Metropolitan with a full Colorado River Aqueduct within <br />California's basic apportionment. <br /> <br />The Criteria for Coordinated Long-Range Operation of Colorado <br />River Reservoirs (Operating criteria) developed pursuant to the <br />COlorado River Basin Project Act of September 30, 1968 (P.L. 90- <br />537) requires the Secretary of the Interior to annually prepare a <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.