My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06652
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06652
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:12:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:47:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.300
Description
Colorado River-Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program-General Information/Publications
State
CO
Date
1/1/1974
Author
CWCB
Title
Colorado Water Conservation Board-1974 Demonstration Farms for Salinity Reduction on the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />THE DAVIS FARM <br /> <br />The Colorado Water Conservation Board selected this farm by drawing <br />from a group of farms'\'lhich met the criteria of readily available water <br />and electrical supply. It is situated north and east of Palisade, <br />Colorado, and just outside the city limits. <br /> <br />Because of a limited budget, all of the installation work was <br />performed by CWCB personnel. The total cost of this installation was <br />$7,381.15 or $359/acre. This paper will describe the design and outline <br />some of the problems one might encounter with a similar installation. <br /> <br />I. The Filtration Unit <br /> <br />The importance of good filtration cannot be overemphasized. Con- <br />sideration should be given toward obtaining suspended solids samples of <br />the water to be used. At times the Colorado River will' carry as much as <br />200 ppm suspended solids. Using this figure <br /> <br />200 X 8.34 = 1558 pounds/100,OOO gallons <br /> <br />(since we often run about 50,000 gallons per day) there could be a ton <br />of material every three days. Much of the fine material will pass <br />through the filtering system, therefore we recommend a weekly flushing <br />of the lines during severe muddy conditions. <br /> <br />The manufacturer of our filter equipment has recommended that a <br />figure of 25 GPM/square foot of filter surface be used. Experience has <br />shown this figure to be somewhat inadequate for the time when the river <br />is running high in sediment. At this time we believe that from 15 to 17 <br />GPM/square foot is necessary. We have found that after about sixty days <br />use, the filter sand becomes coated with clay that is not cleaned off <br />in the backwash. The filter sand cleans easily in a strong sulfuric acid <br />solution. The filter system should be equipped with a pressure sensing <br />device which can be set at the desired pressure differential for back- <br />washing. The pressure differential must be set low enough that when the <br />backwash cycle begins there is enough water still getting through the <br />system to flush the first tank. If there isn't enough water to do this <br />backwash, the system will completely plug up. When this happens you have <br />to reach into the filters and stir the top sand so the water will start <br />through. <br /> <br />After the sand filters a 180 mesh screen filter was placed to catch <br />anything that might get by the sand filters. One of the problems <br />encountered was that this final filter was clogging too rapidly and it <br />required the constant attention of someone to clean the screen. Part of <br /> <br />1704 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.