Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0014 J'~ <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />The flood data used to define the high-flow storage requirements may be <br />analysed and presented in several ways. At a gaging station, the greatest <br />known historic flood or the greatest flood experienced during the period of <br />operation could be used; however this procedure would not define how fre- <br />quently such an event might be expected in the future. At a gaging station, <br />the distribution of flood events could be used, but this does not allow for the <br />differences between stations. A generalized distribution of flood events in a <br />long-term common period based on data from all sites could be used; but <br />this method, although appropriate in some parts of the United States, was <br />found to show excessive variations throughout Kansas. The expectancy of <br />storage requirements needed would be best defined if records were avail- <br />able over a long-term period at all sites. Because long records are avail- <br />able at relatively few sites, regression techniques have been used in this re- <br />port to extend short-term streamflow records to a 40-year period, 1921-60. <br />Also historic flood discharges, where available, were used to modify the fre- <br />quency curves drawn from the 40-year records and to indicate the shape of <br />the frequency curve at sites where historic flood data are not available. <br />Through the use of flood discharge frequency curves developed at 101 gaging <br />stations in Kansas and vicinity, this report presents for selected chances of <br />recurrence the storage capacity necessary to store and release gross flood <br />volumes at various rates. Also the storage capacity for the 101 sites is <br />shown for the maximum flood volume of record. <br /> <br />Investigators of flood control measures may wish to evaluate various <br />operational plans for releasing flood runoff from storage. To aid their study, <br />the design outflow release rates in this report are considered a constant <br />with excess inflow retained as storage. The outflow rate in this report is a <br />gross amount with no allowance for evaporation and seepage losses, which <br />need to be evaluated separately for each specific reservoir site. <br /> <br />Frequently streamflow data are needed at sites where no gaging-station <br />records have been obtained. Procedures for estima ting high-flow storage <br />requirements at ungaged sites are outlined and illustrated. <br /> <br />The order of presentation in this report is: first to describe the develop- <br />ment of frequency curves of flood runoffof various durations; second, to de- <br />velop and present data on flood-volume storage requirements at gaging sta- <br />tion sites; third, to explain the variations in the storage-outflow relations so <br />as to provide a means of estima ting storage requirements at sites where <br />specific streamflow information is not available. <br />