My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06613
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:45:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Rates
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/16/1982
Author
USDOE/WAPA
Title
Hearing on Information Forum, CRSP, Proposed Adjustments of Transmission and Power Rates
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />? <br /> <br />i"h. ,IUJ.":d,,!\J: 'l'tl(!nk yuu, lNioyne.e()U", lHUlil!Il'j. <br /> <br />As Wayne just explained, the average generation from the <br /> <br />3 computer model of the rolorado River was used for the energy <br /> <br />~ projection in the powcr repayment study. In the earlier years <br /> <br />5 tl~ rough 1989, it: WilS assumed thilt the energy purchases would be <br /> <br />~ made to meet firm commitments if the average generation <br /> <br />7 projection was not high enough to fill that requirement. After <br /> <br />B 1~rg, we assumed that the contract commitments would miltch the <br /> <br />9 projected average annual generation. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />There is a tabulation of the average generation, the firm <br /> <br />]] lOMl, anrl thE' ilssum(!d purchases for the years through 1989. <br /> <br />17. Notc that purchases where required for all the yeiHs through <br /> <br />13 1989, and there was therefore no nonfirm generation projected <br /> <br />l~ for thin period. This includes the energy commitments under <br /> <br />15 firm contrilct to preferenced customers, energy to firm up the <br /> <br />16 Rio Grande project generation, and energy for project use <br /> <br />17 rcquifl)mC'nts including sidinity control purposes. <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />The Spptember, 198], clepletion schedule for the Upper <br /> <br />19 Colorado River easin, modified hy rescheduling the five <br /> <br />20 participating projects that are in an inactive status, was used <br /> <br />7.1 as the basis for projecting energy and capacity for the fiscal <br /> <br />72 1981 power repayment study. Prior- to that modification, the <br /> <br />2] end of the repayment periods of the Fruitland Mesa, San Miguel" <br /> <br />7.4 and West Divide projects in Colorado, the Savery-Pot Hook <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />7.5 project in Colorado and ~yoming, and the L~Barqe project in <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />27 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Inturmountnin Court Reporters <br />7 (, 3-13 9fi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.