My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06607
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06607
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:32 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:45:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8029
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Colorado Agencies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
12/1/1960
Author
Miller and Chutkow
Title
Report on Ground Water Problems and Recommendations for Further Study and Legislative Consideration
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />... 'II ~- 11 <br />lhu ;) d , <br /> <br />31. <br /> <br />OUTLINE OF AMERICAN EXPEftlENCE IN GROUND WATER <br /> <br />By <br /> <br />C. <br /> <br />* <br />E. Busby <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />Experience tells me to approach ground water management problems <br />with real caution and to give special attention to the geology and soils of the <br />area, the nature and extent of the water supply, the present and prospec- <br />tive uses, and the legal and political background of the State. It is a <br />problem in social engineering to use the terms coined by Roscoe Pound. <br />I shall talk about ground water in this setting. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />In the case of the High Plains of Texas, the groundwater body is <br />a vast sheet of water under a blanket of sedimentary rocks, without appre- <br />ciable natural replenishment from precipitations or high snow sources. <br />In the sense of a sheet, this is like the Ogallala formations in Colorado <br />and the St. Peter and Dakota sandstones in the Plains. But in terms of <br />natural replenishment and artesian pressures, it is not. So the supply <br />in the Texas area is a "wasting asset, " mined as if it were an ore body <br />(unless some remote and feasible possibility of artificial replenishment <br />develops in the future). The users are conservative in the ir attitude <br />toward property rights, so change from the very conservative common <br />law rules toward the most progressive statutory controls is presently <br />impractical. <br /> <br />Thus, the local groundwater district laws of Texas~ / seek mainly <br />to reduce water waste and to control the spacing of wells affecting <br />drawdown. These involve land use and conservation practices. This <br />general method has real educational and teChnical-guidance value and <br />places individual and group responsibility near home. <br /> <br />The life of the ground water reservoir supply is limited and the <br />irrigated area will probably revert to grazing-dry farming in a century. <br />But in the meantime, the landowners and users can work together to <br />manage efficiently their common water resource. Here the water con- <br />servation and soil conservation districts can combine their powers and <br />facilities, as they are now doing. <br /> <br />-' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />* <br />Water Program Specialist, Soil Conservation Service, U. S. Department <br />of Agriculture. <br /> <br />1/ Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. (Vernon, Supp. 1953) art. 7880-3c; <br />Proceedings, Water Law Conferences, Nov. 1952, June 1954. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.