Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />,-, <br /> <br />..- <br />w <br /> <br /><.0 <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />.' <br /> <br />1.' <br /> <br />frequent bacteriological examination, subs~antially free from color and <br />turbidity, and of satisfactory chemical quality. Harmful chemical con- <br />stituents such as lead, selenium, arsenic, and hexavalent chromium are <br />not normally present in natural waters but are introduced only as 'pollutants <br />from industrial processes. Other harmful chemical constituents such as <br />fluorides and nitrates are found more frequenUy in natural waters. These <br />chemical agents should not be present in water supplies to exceed the stan- <br />dards recommended by the U. S. Public Health Service. For detailed standards <br />and characteristics of acceptable water supplies, see the Public Health Ser- <br />vice Drinking Water Standards (1946) (Reprint No. 2697 from the Public Health <br />Reports, Vol. 61, No. 11, March 15, 1946, Pages 371-)84, see Appendix). In <br />some instances the standards and recommendations of the Public Health Service <br />can be met with chlorination as a minimum of treatment. In other cases, ex- <br />tensive treatment is required. <br /> <br />The advantages in us1Dg wells as the source of water have lODg been <br />recognized. Where ground water is available in the required amount and <br />quality, it generally can be developed quickly and at a relatively low cost. <br />Ground water from deep-seated spriDgs or from wells seldom shows changes <br />in quality such as occur in surface water. In some cases, however, quality <br />changes may occur as a result of leakage through defective well casiDgs. <br />The quality of water obtained from wells usually changes with variations <br />in the depths from which the water is drawn in a given locality and JIaY <br />change materially 10 water from the same beds in different localities, even <br />those that are adjacent, In many areas, ground waters are as good or <br />better in quality than available surface water, and since they can often <br />be used without treatment, may be preferred by prospective users. <br /> <br />Bacteriological Quality <br /> <br />Bacteriological quality of ground water in the AWR basins is not a <br />limiting characteristic from the standpoint of municipal use. \Vhile there <br />are exceptions, in general the bacteriological quality of water derived ' <br />from properly located, designed and constructed wells is good. In those <br />instances .vhere bacteriological quality is a problem, this can be solved <br />by suitable .vater treatment methods. Poor bacteriological quality usually <br />results from poor well location, faulty design or construction or improper <br />maintenance. Failure to plug abandoned wells in the vicinity of active <br />water supply wells and the use of the former as leaching cesspools is <br />another reason for poor bacteriological quality of some underground water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />Physical and Chemical Quality <br /> <br />Ini'ormation as to the quality of ground waters which can be developed <br />in the Arkansas-White-Red River Basins is far from complete. In some areas, <br /> <br />5-3 <br />