My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06585
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06585
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8112.600
Description
Arkansas White Red Basins Interagency Committee - AWRBIAC -- Reports
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/30/1951
Title
Report of the Hydrologic Subcommittee on Water Availability and Quality in the Arkansas-White-Red Basins
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br /><~ <br /><' <br /> <br />I'.' .< <br /> <br />'-' <br />r <br />, <br /> <br />Ie, <br />(', <br />k; <br />'" <br />" <br />.,.; <br />'- <br />0' <br />r:; <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />o <br />,--, <br /> <br />.... <br />N <br />-.J <br />-.J <br /> <br />records at another location or as estimated at a station site for <br />periods prior to the beginning of a continuous discharge record. Thus, <br />..hile the inclusion of runoff estimates in the table has been made to <br />present a general picture of the amount and distribution of available <br />\later, it is probable that in some cases the solution to specific prob- <br />lems of administration, design, and operation may require the establish- <br />ment of some particular gaging station or the continuation of records <br />at some point of collection. <br /> <br />Accuracy of data. Due to the tendency of most streams in the south- <br />..est to shift from one lo...water channel to another, the records collected <br />at gaging stations are frequent~ classified with accuracy rating of poor. <br />The indicated error of dai~ records may exceed 15-e~, but it is probable <br />that the monthly records are some..hat better and that the annual figures <br />are probab~ fair~ representative of the true flow. <br /> <br />Records computed by comparison with records at some other site are <br />some..hat less accurate than an observed discharge, depending upon the <br />magnitude of the extrapolation. <br /> <br />Records presented as computed from rainfall runoff studies are <br />general~ of an approximate nature. Such data are not intended to repre- <br />sent a chronologically historic flo.. for the calendar months shown; the <br />estimates have their significance in the iU.em1se that if a climatic <br />cycle similar to that of the past were to recur, on an average, the <br />figures of estimated flo.. are representative of the flo.. that might <br />be expected. <br /> <br />3-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.