<br />o u J ~2
<br />
<br />County economic grovth Is regarded as desirable.
<br />
<br />Changes in the ecanOQlc component balance are seen as inevitable but they should be
<br />gradual.
<br />
<br />E. RESOURCES
<br />
<br />The Piedra River corridor is only a small part of the entire valley. However, it is important
<br />to gain perspective of the entire reaource base of the valley to better understand the role the
<br />river corridor assumes with respect to the economic and environmental considerations for the
<br />local area, region and state.
<br />
<br />Outdoor Recreation: A vide variety of outdoor recreation opportunity is available In the Piedra
<br />Valley. Activities include camping at developed sites or baCKpacking, hiking, fishing, hunting.
<br />picnicking, horae riding, anQWQObiling, off-road vehicle activities. and white vater boating.
<br />The river corridor contributes to the bulk of the fishing, hiking, backpack camping and white
<br />water boating uses. The river corridor, vhile not being the primary area for hunting, is
<br />generally used as access routes and locations for the hunter camps.
<br />
<br />Within the Piedra Valley there are ten developed campgrounds, One picnic ground and one boat
<br />launch site, The theoretic seasonal capacity for the developed sites is 212,000 visitor days.
<br />Current capacity is 1,055 persons at one tlme. Only four of the developed campgrounds and the
<br />picnic area are located in the river corridor. The capacity of these develop~ents in the
<br />corridor is 230 persons at One time.
<br />
<br />ViSitor use On National Forest lands are estiNated each yesr and reported in the Forest Service's
<br />Recreation Information Management System. Table II shows a summary of past reported use totals
<br />for all activities.
<br />
<br />Historical use trends in the river corridor have ahovn a small but steady iocrease each year. it
<br />is expected that this trend will continue and perhaps be accelerated by increasing d~and for
<br />white water recreation. The use could also increase at a higher rate each year on account of the
<br />greater exposure of the river to the public through Wild and Scenic Rivers designation.
<br />
<br />TABLE II
<br />
<br />S~~RY OF REPORTED RECREATION USE
<br />(Visitor Days)
<br />
<br />Year
<br />
<br />Total
<br />Forest
<br />Use
<br />
<br />Totsi
<br />Piedra
<br />Valley Use
<br />
<br />Percent
<br />of Forest
<br />U,.
<br />
<br />Eatl_ted.
<br />Riv..r
<br />Corridor Use
<br />
<br />1975
<br />1976
<br />1977
<br />1978
<br />
<br />l,5lo9,JOO
<br />1,556,800
<br />1.501,200
<br />1,832,400
<br />
<br />235,100
<br />242,700
<br />264,900
<br />326,200
<br />
<br />15.2
<br />15.8
<br />11.6
<br />11.8
<br />
<br />98,000
<br />98,400
<br />99,200
<br />101,300
<br />
<br />*Corridor use is estimated because the RIM syste~ does not carry the river corridor as a
<br />separate recreation element.
<br />
<br />~ilderoess: The upper Middle and East Forks are segments of the river corridor located in the
<br />Weminuche Wilderness. The river corridor affects 5,100 aCres of the 391,489 aCre Wilderness.
<br />The proposed Weminuche Wilderness ~nagement Plan contsins provisions which are more restrictive
<br />than management provided for under the Inter-depart~ental management objectiv..s for wild rivers.
<br />
<br />The proposed w~inuche Plan directs that should a wild and scenic river designation attract in-
<br />creased users to the detri~nt of the wilderness resource and values, user levels will be
<br />controlled.
<br />
<br />Reported use figures are not available for the river corridor within the ~eminuche because the
<br />RIM system heretofore did not consider the corridor as a specific recreation element. By sub-
<br />tracting the uses and activities reported for the Weminuche that are known to be outside the
<br />corridor, the estimated use approximates 1,900, 2,000 and 2,900 visitor days respectively for
<br />1975, 1916 and 1971.
<br />
<br />The proposed Wilderness Management Flan, utili~ing a system of recreation management units and
<br />carrying capacity WQuld limit use of the river corridor in the future when it reaches appro~i-
<br />=stely 5,000 visitor days for both the ~ddle and East Forks.
<br />
<br />~ildlife: The Pledra .alley contains moSt species of wildlife found at compsrable elevatloos
<br />throughout the State of Colorado. Principle non-game apecies include beaver. marten, mink,
<br />coyote, bobcat and a host of other small mammals, birds of prey, reptiles and song bitds.
<br />
<br />1-'
<br />
|