Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o u J ~2 <br /> <br />County economic grovth Is regarded as desirable. <br /> <br />Changes in the ecanOQlc component balance are seen as inevitable but they should be <br />gradual. <br /> <br />E. RESOURCES <br /> <br />The Piedra River corridor is only a small part of the entire valley. However, it is important <br />to gain perspective of the entire reaource base of the valley to better understand the role the <br />river corridor assumes with respect to the economic and environmental considerations for the <br />local area, region and state. <br /> <br />Outdoor Recreation: A vide variety of outdoor recreation opportunity is available In the Piedra <br />Valley. Activities include camping at developed sites or baCKpacking, hiking, fishing, hunting. <br />picnicking, horae riding, anQWQObiling, off-road vehicle activities. and white vater boating. <br />The river corridor contributes to the bulk of the fishing, hiking, backpack camping and white <br />water boating uses. The river corridor, vhile not being the primary area for hunting, is <br />generally used as access routes and locations for the hunter camps. <br /> <br />Within the Piedra Valley there are ten developed campgrounds, One picnic ground and one boat <br />launch site, The theoretic seasonal capacity for the developed sites is 212,000 visitor days. <br />Current capacity is 1,055 persons at one tlme. Only four of the developed campgrounds and the <br />picnic area are located in the river corridor. The capacity of these develop~ents in the <br />corridor is 230 persons at One time. <br /> <br />ViSitor use On National Forest lands are estiNated each yesr and reported in the Forest Service's <br />Recreation Information Management System. Table II shows a summary of past reported use totals <br />for all activities. <br /> <br />Historical use trends in the river corridor have ahovn a small but steady iocrease each year. it <br />is expected that this trend will continue and perhaps be accelerated by increasing d~and for <br />white water recreation. The use could also increase at a higher rate each year on account of the <br />greater exposure of the river to the public through Wild and Scenic Rivers designation. <br /> <br />TABLE II <br /> <br />S~~RY OF REPORTED RECREATION USE <br />(Visitor Days) <br /> <br />Year <br /> <br />Total <br />Forest <br />Use <br /> <br />Totsi <br />Piedra <br />Valley Use <br /> <br />Percent <br />of Forest <br />U,. <br /> <br />Eatl_ted. <br />Riv..r <br />Corridor Use <br /> <br />1975 <br />1976 <br />1977 <br />1978 <br /> <br />l,5lo9,JOO <br />1,556,800 <br />1.501,200 <br />1,832,400 <br /> <br />235,100 <br />242,700 <br />264,900 <br />326,200 <br /> <br />15.2 <br />15.8 <br />11.6 <br />11.8 <br /> <br />98,000 <br />98,400 <br />99,200 <br />101,300 <br /> <br />*Corridor use is estimated because the RIM syste~ does not carry the river corridor as a <br />separate recreation element. <br /> <br />~ilderoess: The upper Middle and East Forks are segments of the river corridor located in the <br />Weminuche Wilderness. The river corridor affects 5,100 aCres of the 391,489 aCre Wilderness. <br />The proposed Weminuche Wilderness ~nagement Plan contsins provisions which are more restrictive <br />than management provided for under the Inter-depart~ental management objectiv..s for wild rivers. <br /> <br />The proposed w~inuche Plan directs that should a wild and scenic river designation attract in- <br />creased users to the detri~nt of the wilderness resource and values, user levels will be <br />controlled. <br /> <br />Reported use figures are not available for the river corridor within the ~eminuche because the <br />RIM system heretofore did not consider the corridor as a specific recreation element. By sub- <br />tracting the uses and activities reported for the Weminuche that are known to be outside the <br />corridor, the estimated use approximates 1,900, 2,000 and 2,900 visitor days respectively for <br />1975, 1916 and 1971. <br /> <br />The proposed Wilderness Management Flan, utili~ing a system of recreation management units and <br />carrying capacity WQuld limit use of the river corridor in the future when it reaches appro~i- <br />=stely 5,000 visitor days for both the ~ddle and East Forks. <br /> <br />~ildlife: The Pledra .alley contains moSt species of wildlife found at compsrable elevatloos <br />throughout the State of Colorado. Principle non-game apecies include beaver. marten, mink, <br />coyote, bobcat and a host of other small mammals, birds of prey, reptiles and song bitds. <br /> <br />1-' <br />