WSP06561

• File Number: 8273.600
• Description: Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - USDA
• Basin: Colorado Mainstem
• Water Division: 5
• Date: 6/1/1990
• Author: Soil Cons Svc
• Title: Patterson Hollow - USDA Water Quality Hydrologic Unit Area Proposal
• Water Supply Pro - Doc Type: Report/Study

ENCLOSURE NO 1

CHECK Ll ST

N
C.D
.,J
W

STATE: Colorado NAME OF PROJECT/ACTIVITY: Pattepse~. I~lle~
USDA Water Ouallty Hydrologic Unit Area
STATE CONTACT PERSON:(Name ~ Telephone number) .'

ASCS: Garth Bond
CES: Jim C. Loftis
SCS: Stephen K Chick

[phone]
[phone]
[phone]

1. MAP OF AREA I NCLUDED? Yes
2. IS AREA CLEARLY DEFINED ON A WATERSHED/AQUIFER BASIS? Irrigated Area
3. WHAT IS OVERALL SIZE OF AREA (AC) 89,850 Acres
4. IF DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, WHAT NEW TECHNOLOGY WILL BE DEMONSTRATED?
: '

5. ARE AGRICULTURAL NPS PROBLEMS THE MAJOR FOCUS? YES~NO____IF NO, WHAT IS
FOCUS?
6. IS ACTION RELATED TO THE STATE NPS ASSESSEMENT REPORT OR MANAGEMENT PLAN
(SECTION 319)? YES~ND____
7. WHAT IS MAJOR EMPHASIS OF PROBLEM? GROUNDWATER SURFACE WATER BOTH x
8. DOES PROBLEM DIRECTLY AFFECT: ESTUARY LAKE STREAM RIVER XDRINKING WATERx
9. DOES PROBLEM DIRECTLY AFFECT HOUSEHOLo-WAIE~SUPPLY~YES ~O x --
10. WHAT IS IMPAIRMENT TO WATER QUALITY? NUTRIENTS x PESTICIDESX SEDIMENT x
OTHER(WHAT) Sa1 inity - -- --
11. WHAT IS DURATION OF PLAN? S-YR x ; 4-YR ; 3-YR____; 2-YR____; l-YR_
NOTE: ACP WQSP is limited to-':year ---

12. DOES PLAN OF ACTION IDENTIFY:
-ROLE OF EACH AGENCY Yes
-ESTABLISHED DEADLINES Yes
-HAVE MEASURABLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS Yes
---LIST THE 3 MOST IMPORTANT MEASURABLE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
(1) Reduce amount of salt reaching the river
(2) Improver lrrlgatlon water management
(3) ~eauce over aprllcatlon of nutrlents and pestlcides

13. DOES SOLUTION SECTION ADDRESS STATED PROBLEM? Yes
14. DOES PLAN OF ACTION PROVIDE FOR AN INFORMATION AND EDUCATION PROGRAM? Yes
15. DOES PLAN PROVIDE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF PRACTICES WITHIN:
FIRST YEAR? YES~NO___; SECOND YEAR? YES___NO___; THIRD YEAR? YES___NO___
16. ARE COST SHARE PRACTICES IDENTIFIED? Yes
-WILL ACP FUNDS BE USED FOR COST SHARE? YES x NO
-WILL EPA FUNDS BE USED FOR COST SHARE? YE$-NO~
-WILL STATE FUNDS BE USED FOR COST SHARE? YES_NOX

17. DOES PLAN PROVIDE FOR. A MONITORING PROGRAM? YES x NO ,IF YES, WHO
WILL DO MONITORING? STATE WATER QUALITY AGENCY___ EPA___ OTHER(WHO) USGS
lB. DOES PLAN DESCRIBE DATA TO BE COLLECTED? YES x NO
T9. DOES PLAN OF ACTION PROVIDE FOR AN EVALUATION? YES~NO
20. DOES PLAN INCLUDE AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MECHANISM?~
21. DOES PLAN INCLUOE A BUDGET SUMMARY FOR LENGTH OF PLAN AND ANNUAL BUDGETS? Yes
-DOES BUDGET SHOW NEEDS OF ALL AGENCY? Yes
-IS THERE A 50S STATE MATCH FOR ES BUDGET? Yes