Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l\) <br />c..:J <br />(;0 <br />.(... <br /> <br />on the Arkansas <br />recreat i on, and <br /> <br />River, is used for flood <br />irrigation storage. <br /> <br />control, <br /> <br />The aquatic habitat in the Arkansas River IS affected by <br />sediment, salt, nutrients, and pesticides. Spa~ning areas <br />and food sources can be smothered by the sediment, water <br />becomes turbid affecting the feeding abl I ity of the aquatic <br />fauna. 'Nutrients in the runoff as wel I as the pesticides <br />can tax the available oxygen. <br /> <br />Whi Ie some economic value may be lost in recreation damage, <br />little data is available from the biological impacts. This <br />is true for John Martin Reservoir ~here fishing is popular <br />and a I so I n areas above John Mart i n ~here water qua Ii ty <br />degradation has resulted in very I ittle remaining fishing <br />opportunities. <br /> <br />OBJECTIVES <br /> <br />The objectives of the Patterson Hollo~ Water Qual i ty project <br />are to improve the Arkansas River water qua Ii ty by reduc i ng <br />the amount of salts reaching the river in return.flows and <br />~mprove the irrigation water management being practiced In <br />the area. <br /> <br />Improved irrigation ~ater management ~i I I control the amount <br />of deep percolation and runoff from the Irrigated cropland. <br />Reduc i ng the amount of water mov i ng through the so i I prof i Ie <br />wi I I minimize the pickup and transportation of salts, <br />nutrients, and pesticides. <br /> <br />Installation of planned practices wi II improve the <br />irrigation efficiencies from the present of approximately 40 <br />percent to 60 percent. A reduction of approximately four <br />inches of deep percolation is expected ~ith this improvement <br />in efficiency. This reduction in deep percolation means <br />that over one ton per acre of salt <over 60,000 tons/year <br />from the total area) can be eliminated from the river. <br /> <br />Reduced sal inity in the Arkansas River ~i II broaden the <br />potential cropping patterns and yields in the downstream <br />irrigated areas and improve the fishery habitat in the river <br />and John Martin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Improved farm irrigation systems wi I I al low for reduced <br />operation and management costs to the landowner and <br />operators in the project area. This in turn wi II improve <br />the overall economic viability of the county. <br /> <br />9 <br />