<br />002731
<br />
<br />present and potential sources of drinking water, and "dirty" aquifers (see WSW #502).
<br />According to ~ls, Mlay, state classification of aquifers would not be mandatory;
<br />rather the system is to help EPA establish protection and clean up priorities, Under
<br />the proposed classification system,' EPA would coordinate authority under existing
<br />statutes to provide ground water protection. For instance special aquifers, including
<br />those which are a sole source of drinking water or support a unique ecosystem, would
<br />be protected by prohibiting hazardous waste sites in the area under the Resource
<br />Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) , Priority w:>uld also be given for cleanup
<br />efforts above such aquifers under Superfund. Similar priority w:>uld be given to
<br />present and potential drinking water sources, The use, disposal and storage of
<br />threatening chemicals would also be controlled using the Toxic Substance Control Act.
<br />In view of the magnitude of the ground water pollution problem and the limited
<br />availability of remedial resources, "dirty" aquifers, those already contaminated and
<br />not used for drinking water, would most likely receive little regulation and cleanup.
<br />Wi1ile some question "writing off" such aquifers, Governor Bruce Babbitt told the
<br />WSWC/ABA Grol.IIl<i \,ater Workshop last r,,;eek that protecting all ground water sources
<br />from pollution does not make sense. "It is not practical, economical, or necessary."
<br />A new ground water protection office would be established under the Assistant Secre-
<br />tary for Water to administer the new strategy and greater emphasis would be placed on
<br />presently unregulated sources of serious ground water pollution, specifically under-
<br />ground storage tanks for petroleum prcx:lucts and chemicals (see WSW #499).
<br />
<br />WATER RESOORCES
<br />
<br />Financing/Tax-E:xelq>t Borrl Limitation Act
<br />On Nov. 17, 1983, by a slim lO-vote margin, the House refused to approve a rule
<br />for consideration of H,R. 4170, a major tax reform bill. The National Governors'
<br />Association actively opposed restrictions in the bill on the use of industrial de-
<br />velopment bonds (IDBs) , The Westem States Water Council also opposes specific
<br />provisions (see WSW #504). Title VII, the Tax-Exempt Bond Limitation Act of 1983,
<br />would impose a $150 per capita limit on state and local government use of IDBs, This
<br />cumulative ceiling would be reduced to $100 after 1986. Over half the states current-
<br />ly would exceed the $150 limit, IDBs are now used by state and local governments to
<br />finance water and wastewater treatment, solid and hazardous waste disposal facili-
<br />ties, resource recovery plants, and power plant air pcllution scrubbers. The bill
<br />also prohibits the use of IDBs to acquire land. At present, 25-50% of current trans-
<br />actions involve land acquisition, It also reduces arbitrage profit limitations from
<br />the current 1 l/Z'Io to 1 1/8%. Arbitrage profits come from investing any unused
<br />portion of bond proceeds until needed for their intended purpose. Many state and
<br />local agencies credit arbitrage profits towards administrative costs of issuing
<br />bonds, Another restriction in the bill would deny tax-exempt status for any project
<br />obligation where the federal government directly or indirectly guarantees the pay-
<br />ment of principal or interest, or a significant portion of any proceeds are invested
<br />in federally insured deposits or accounts. During the first half of 1983, the IRS
<br />estimates $1.8B in tax-exempt bonds were issued for pollution control, including the
<br />above activities, and the estimated 1983 total could be approximately $4B, H.R. 4170
<br />will be pending when Congress returns on January 23, but it may already have had an
<br />effect on the bond market as its proposed effective date, if enacted, would be
<br />January 1, 1984, Bonds issued thereafter would have to conform with its provisions
<br />or lose their tax-exempt status. (NGA - The Resource 12/83 and CR November 16, 1983
<br />P. H10071-72)
<br />
<br />'-
<br />
<br />POSITION 0PEtlll;
<br />The Upper Colorado River Conrnission has a Chief Engineer opening. The position
<br />requires a B.S. or M,S. Degree in Engineering plus six or more years (after B.S.) ex-
<br />perience in water resource engineering, hydrology and management. The salary range
<br />i,s $25,000 - $35,000 per year, plus benefits. Resumes should be sent to 355 South
<br />400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111; for more information call (801) 531-1150,
<br />
<br />Western States Water, January 20, 1984
<br />
|