Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002731 <br /> <br />present and potential sources of drinking water, and "dirty" aquifers (see WSW #502). <br />According to ~ls, Mlay, state classification of aquifers would not be mandatory; <br />rather the system is to help EPA establish protection and clean up priorities, Under <br />the proposed classification system,' EPA would coordinate authority under existing <br />statutes to provide ground water protection. For instance special aquifers, including <br />those which are a sole source of drinking water or support a unique ecosystem, would <br />be protected by prohibiting hazardous waste sites in the area under the Resource <br />Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) , Priority w:>uld also be given for cleanup <br />efforts above such aquifers under Superfund. Similar priority w:>uld be given to <br />present and potential drinking water sources, The use, disposal and storage of <br />threatening chemicals would also be controlled using the Toxic Substance Control Act. <br />In view of the magnitude of the ground water pollution problem and the limited <br />availability of remedial resources, "dirty" aquifers, those already contaminated and <br />not used for drinking water, would most likely receive little regulation and cleanup. <br />Wi1ile some question "writing off" such aquifers, Governor Bruce Babbitt told the <br />WSWC/ABA Grol.IIl<i \,ater Workshop last r,,;eek that protecting all ground water sources <br />from pollution does not make sense. "It is not practical, economical, or necessary." <br />A new ground water protection office would be established under the Assistant Secre- <br />tary for Water to administer the new strategy and greater emphasis would be placed on <br />presently unregulated sources of serious ground water pollution, specifically under- <br />ground storage tanks for petroleum prcx:lucts and chemicals (see WSW #499). <br /> <br />WATER RESOORCES <br /> <br />Financing/Tax-E:xelq>t Borrl Limitation Act <br />On Nov. 17, 1983, by a slim lO-vote margin, the House refused to approve a rule <br />for consideration of H,R. 4170, a major tax reform bill. The National Governors' <br />Association actively opposed restrictions in the bill on the use of industrial de- <br />velopment bonds (IDBs) , The Westem States Water Council also opposes specific <br />provisions (see WSW #504). Title VII, the Tax-Exempt Bond Limitation Act of 1983, <br />would impose a $150 per capita limit on state and local government use of IDBs, This <br />cumulative ceiling would be reduced to $100 after 1986. Over half the states current- <br />ly would exceed the $150 limit, IDBs are now used by state and local governments to <br />finance water and wastewater treatment, solid and hazardous waste disposal facili- <br />ties, resource recovery plants, and power plant air pcllution scrubbers. The bill <br />also prohibits the use of IDBs to acquire land. At present, 25-50% of current trans- <br />actions involve land acquisition, It also reduces arbitrage profit limitations from <br />the current 1 l/Z'Io to 1 1/8%. Arbitrage profits come from investing any unused <br />portion of bond proceeds until needed for their intended purpose. Many state and <br />local agencies credit arbitrage profits towards administrative costs of issuing <br />bonds, Another restriction in the bill would deny tax-exempt status for any project <br />obligation where the federal government directly or indirectly guarantees the pay- <br />ment of principal or interest, or a significant portion of any proceeds are invested <br />in federally insured deposits or accounts. During the first half of 1983, the IRS <br />estimates $1.8B in tax-exempt bonds were issued for pollution control, including the <br />above activities, and the estimated 1983 total could be approximately $4B, H.R. 4170 <br />will be pending when Congress returns on January 23, but it may already have had an <br />effect on the bond market as its proposed effective date, if enacted, would be <br />January 1, 1984, Bonds issued thereafter would have to conform with its provisions <br />or lose their tax-exempt status. (NGA - The Resource 12/83 and CR November 16, 1983 <br />P. H10071-72) <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />POSITION 0PEtlll; <br />The Upper Colorado River Conrnission has a Chief Engineer opening. The position <br />requires a B.S. or M,S. Degree in Engineering plus six or more years (after B.S.) ex- <br />perience in water resource engineering, hydrology and management. The salary range <br />i,s $25,000 - $35,000 per year, plus benefits. Resumes should be sent to 355 South <br />400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111; for more information call (801) 531-1150, <br /> <br />Western States Water, January 20, 1984 <br />