Laserfiche WebLink
<br />concentrations at or below levels presently found in <br />the lower main stem. In implementing the salinity <br />policy objective for the Colorado River System, the <br />salinity problem must be treated as a basinwide <br />problem that needs to be solved to maintain Lower <br />Basin water salinity at or below present levels while <br />the Upper Basin continues to develop its <br />compact-apportioned waters. <br /> <br />"II. The salinity control program as described by <br />the Department of the Interior in their report <br />entitled "Colorado River Quality Improvement <br />Program," dated February 1972, offers the best <br />prospect for implementing the salinity control <br />ob je cti ve adopted herein. Therefore, it is <br />recommended that: <br /> <br />"(1) to minimize salinity increases in the river, a <br />salinity control program, generally as described <br />in the Interior Department report, be <br />implemented on an accelerated basis; <br /> <br />"(2) the Bureau of Reclamation have the <br />primary responsibility for investigation, planning, <br />and implementing the basinwide salinity, control <br />program in the Colorado River System; <br /> <br />"(3) to accelerate the salinity control program, <br />the Bureau of Reclamation assign a high priority <br />to LaVerkin Springs, Paradox Valley, and Grand <br />Valley water quality improvement projects with <br />the objective of achieving stabilization of salinity <br />levels on the Lower Colorado River at the earliest <br />possible date. The contemplated impact would <br />be to initiate immediate action so as to achieve, <br />by 1977, the removal of 80,000 tons of salt per <br />year from LaVerkin Springs, 180,000 tons per <br />year from Paradox Valley, and 140,000 tons per <br />year from Grand Valley. This would provide a <br />total reduction of 400,000 tons per year and <br />would result in an estimated subsequent <br />reduction of 33 mg/l at I mperial Dam. <br /> <br />"(4) the Office of Saline Water contribute to the <br />program by assisting the Bureau of Reclamation <br />as required to appraise the practicablility of <br />applying desalting techniques; and <br /> <br />"(5) the Envi.onmental Protection Agency <br />continue its support of the program by <br />consulting with and advising the Bureau of <br />Reclamation and accelerating its ongoing data <br />collection and research efforts. <br /> <br />"III. To achieve the salinity policy described <br />herein, the long-range program of the Bureau of <br /> <br />Reclamation shall be directed toward achieving <br />reduction of salinity concentrations that would <br />otherwise exist at Imperial Dam to the extent of at <br />least 120 mg/l in 1980,355 mg/l in 1990, and 405 <br />mg/l in the year 2000. <br /> <br />"Th e conferees agree that the Bureau of <br />Reclamation's program as submitted in its report <br />"Colorado River Water Quality Improvement <br />Program,'" dated February 1972, should be <br />considered as an open-ended and flexible program. <br />If alternatives not yet identified prove to be more <br />feasible, they should be included as part of the <br />program, and if elements now included prove not to <br />be feasible, they should be dropped. In addition, it <br />should be recognized that there may be other <br />programs which could reduce the river's salinity. <br />Since present levels are greater than desirable, an <br />effort should be made to develop additional <br />programs that will obtain lower salinity levels. <br /> <br />:~, <br /> <br />"The February 1972 report states that the Bureau <br />of Reclamation Mathematical Simulation Model for <br />the Colorado River System will be used to evaluate <br />the Water Quality Improvement Program. This will <br />be an important tool to evalute the program's <br />progress. The results of this evaluation along with <br />the general program progress should be reported <br />annually to the conferees and other interested State <br />agencies. " <br /> <br />The recommendations and conclusions of the <br />Enforcement Conference were subsequently approved <br />by the EPA Administrator. On June 9, 1972, Deputy <br />Administrator Robert Fri advised Secretary Morton of <br />the approval in the following letter: <br /> <br />"Honorable Rogers C.B. Morton <br />Secretary of the Interior <br />Washington, D.C. 20240 <br /> <br />"Dear Mr. Secretary: <br /> <br />"Thank you for the participation of your <br />Department in the seventh session of the conference in <br />the matter of pollution of the interstate waters of the <br />Colorado River and its tributaries <br />(Co I orad 0- Utah -Ari zon a. Nevada-California New <br />Mexico-Wyoming), held under the provisions of the <br />Federal Water Pollution Control Act on February <br />15-17,1972, in Las Vegas, Nevada, and on April 26-27, <br />1972, in Denver, Colorado. I am enclosing a copy of <br />the summary of the conference which contains the <br />conclusions and recommendations of the conferees. <br /> <br />20 <br />