Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />dike arOund The POI'l!S of eruPT'On TO collect the <br />disChargl;'s and then convey the water by p;pelme to <In <br />evapOration pond some 3 miles "way. Two JllerflJtives <br />will be presented far construCtion of the re1aming dike. <br />The less expensive of the two WOuld use a conCrete <br />w,,/1 for rmPJunding the Water at Ihe geyser Site as <br />Compared to a more COsTly but mare esthetically <br />pleasmg SOil'ct'mer!! dike In the second plan. <br /> <br />w <br />o <br />..... <br />::;) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />LAS VEGAS WASH UNIT, NEVADA <br /> <br />wh'ch WOuld reduce TOtaf dlno/ved solids <br />Con~ntratlOns at fm/llnial Dam by aboUI 9 mg/1. <br /> <br />A feasibility report on The LaVer kin Sprmgs Unit IS <br />Undergomg em tnhouse review af the present lime. One <br />alternative calls for the COnstruction of an upper <br />diverSIOn dam UPstream frOm the SPflngs to divert the <br />nO/mal riverflows arOUnd The area 01 the springs. The <br />lower COnlrol dam WOuld be locaTed JUSt below the <br />springs TO form a pao' from which the Springs' flows <br />\'IIould be PUmped to the laVerkln DeSalting Plant. The <br />average inflow 10 the reverse OsmosIs de$.Jhing plant <br />would be 11.5 cis through a 21.inch COncrete preSSUre <br />pipe. It will be neCl'ssary to pretreat the feedwater in <br />the form of calclI.jm reduction, COoling. and fiftration. <br />A desalting alternative mlg"'t consist ot Ihree stages 01 <br />vesst'ls Containing semipermeable membranes. Since the <br />recov!!ry 01 SOme water In each stage Would increase <br />the Oflne concentrallon passed to the SUcceed'"g sta.ge. <br />increasmgly highl;" preSSures would ble' required to <br />elteCtlvely reCOlfer ildditional water. A product wale, <br />of 8.3 cis WOuld lJl' 'ecovelt'd ilf a safinl/y <br />concentraTion 01 500 rng/J. A brine diScharge of 2.8cfs <br />WOuld Iito' at il concentration of 33.000 mg/f, <br /> <br />The PloeJuCt Watl'r Would be returned to the Vlrgm <br />A,.....r through a 1,600.loOl_long Plpelme. A 12'mctJ <br />Plp~fllle <II mOST 19.000 leet long Would be used 10 <br />Pump lhe b"lle to if 440-acfe eVdPOriltloll nand formed <br />by diking a natural de~lIeSSIOn aboUl 4 mlfl's north of <br />Hurricane, Ulah. The dikes would be folred earthlill <br />emlJankmle'llts lilled With 10'mi! PolYVinyl chlorid~'. <br />The le'ntlfe POnd woultl be lined With 10.mil <br />POlyvlnvl-chlaroue sheeling COVered With 12 mchle's at <br />le'ilrlh. <br /> <br />PALO VERDE fRRIGATlON DISTRICT UNIT <br />CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />There il'e abOUT 91.400 acres rnl9atl'd III lhe locally <br />developed dlStrlCl alollg thle' Colorado River In <br />CalifornIa The Irrlgallon of the distrlcl lands resulls in <br />a salt PICkup 01 about 148,000 tOns of Sil11 per year. <br />The If"gi/tlon mana9~ment services dnd Wate, SYSlems <br />Improvement Programs should result m a redUCtion of <br />dbout 23.000 tans m dissolVed solids Per year The <br />mrrespOnd,ng reduction In S<llm'ty Concenlratlon at <br />Imperial Ddm IS abOut 3 mg/f. <br /> <br />Also a Pllvate POwer company IS investlgalll1g the <br />potentIal of using return Haws from the Palo Verdt' <br />drain far nuclear pOwer Plant COolin9_ The diversion of <br />such salmI' flows COuld 'esult In sl9ndicant Salmiry <br />reductions dt ImpeflaJ Dam, <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />Las Vegas Wash serves as a surface drijm for all <br />domestiC, muniCipill. and Indust,ial wastewarers Irom <br />Lils Vegas VaHey. The average <fnnuill dlSChdrge from <br />the Wash fa lake Mle'ad is about 38.000 acre. feet which <br />Carries dpprOlllmately 208,000 tons of diSSOlved sol,ds. <br />Because of the rapidly incfeaslng f>OPulal'on of lht.' <br />vaHey, the ,mnual dIScha,9t.'s of \....att.', and silll ale <br />eXPt'ctpd to mcrease in the nellt few deCil{Jes. <br /> <br />One dltNnatlve WOuld colJect ground-wilfer flows ill <I <br />natura! "barrier" With a groule(j CUrtain Willi and il <br />sefles of PI!rfOrated PipeS. The co!teCted dismarges <br />courcj be PUmped to a nearby reverse OsmosIs deSalting <br />prall!. Manmadl.' sur/act;! /lows 10 the Wash Would l}{' <br />diverted and COnveYC'd arOund Ihe 9rouIl!1'\Vater <br />collection s'te. The Pfoduct water from the deSdltlOg <br />plant Would be joined wllh the surfdce lIow5 for <br />Invalley use Or releilse 10 lake Mead. The brUle reSIdue <br />Would be placed In a lined evaporillion POnd near the <br />projeCt site 01 PUmf)t.'d to Dry lake northeasl of Las <br />Vegas for evapOration. Othle'r alternatives such as <br />e_POrt to D,y Lake for lotal evaporation ilfe still under <br />IOVestlgatlon, <br /> <br />It IS estlmilled thaI the las Vegas Wash Unil Would <br />remove 138,000 tans of saft per year frOm the <br />Colorado River SYstem resultmg in salinity 'educt Ions <br />of about 13 mg/I at rmpenal Dam. <br /> <br />A SpeCial report ShOWing POSSible SOlutions to the <br />problem was completed In January 1974. Feasjbllil.,. <br />IOvestlgatlons on the Las Vegas Wash Unit are <br />scheduled through FY 1976. <br /> <br />LaVERKIN SPRINGS UNIT, UTAH <br /> <br />The LaVerklO SpflOgS are located 10 a 1.800-fOol.long <br />reach 01 rhe TimpOwf>ap Canyon of the Virgin River m <br />SOuthwestle'rr; Utah. The 5pflngs diScha'ge abOut 8,300 <br />acre.feet 01 .....ater and 109.000 IonS of salt each year. <br />A feaSibility Study has been prePared that shows <br />103,000 tans of th,s salt COuld l)€ remOved ilnnual/y <br /> <br />