Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />C',. <br />".:l <br /> <br />;...", <br /> <br />c.;:; <br />~ <br /> <br />Table 2. Six-year review of fishery biologists' San Juan river C. lalipillllis and C. discobolus <br />abnormality data (10/91 - 10197): <br /> <br />Date # of fish sampled % of fish with % of abnormalities that <br /> abnormalilies are lesions <br />10/91 1606 2.6 54 <br />6/92 3018 3.6 65 <br />10/92 3413 0.3 30 <br />10/93 2959 0.4 55 <br />5/94 1878 3.0 74 <br />10194 9524 0.6 30 <br />5/95 1266 0.] 25 <br />10/95 226] 0.8 25 <br />5/96 2557 3.4 72 <br />10/96 2888 1.6 33 <br />5/97 5270 0.4 19 <br />10/97 7440 0.3 32 <br /> <br />Abnormality incidences versus river mile (RM)/Fish health inspection data: During years of high <br />abnormalities, most were found in sections RM ]2]-156 and RM 76. <br /> <br />Fishery biologist data: Most of the abnormalities observed by fishery biologists consistently were found <br />on fish in RM 126-156. As with fish health inspection data, fewer abnormalities were found in Ihe Fall <br />(October) compared to Spring (May) surveys. Few abnormalities were found from Lake Powell (RM 0) <br />to the head of the canyon (RM 78). However, bite marks caused by fish predalors were common. From <br />the head of the canyon to Farmington, New Mexico (RM 178), wounds from bird predators were also <br />common. Both of these wound types were easi ly distinguished from lesions. <br /> <br />Bacterial isolates of San Juan River fish: Bacterial isolates from all survey trips are identified in <br />Table 3. Bacteremia, as indicated by bacteria] growth from kidney tissue tended to follow the <br />abnormality trends on each of the surveys. <br /> <br />4 <br />