My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP06488
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
6001-7000
>
WSP06488
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:23:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:40:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.31.J
Description
San Juan River - Environmental Studies
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
11/1/2000
Title
The Chronic Toxicity of Dietary and Waterborne Selenium to Adult Colorado Pikeminnow in a Water Quality Simulating that in the San Juan River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />c~ <br />r-" <br />,::..... <br />f\) <br />c.o <br /> <br />value (5 IlglL). These results indicated that the diets and possibly the feces and urine were <br /> <br />indirectly adding selenium to the water. <br /> <br />During the depuration period, waterborne selenium concentrations in all tanks were at or <br /> <br />below 0.90 IlglL within II days, except for two replicates of treatment 2, Measured selenium <br /> <br />concentrations in these replicate tanks were 1.55 and 5.65 /-lglL at day II of depuration and 0.95 <br /> <br />and 1.25 1lg!L at day 25 of depuration. At 60 and 90 days of depuration, selenium <br /> <br />concentrations in the replicate with 5,65 1lg!L at day II of depuration were at or below 0,75 <br /> <br />1lg!L. Selenium concentrations in the other replicate tank of treatment 2 for the same periods <br /> <br />were 0.20-0,30 IlglL. The reason for these high selenium values in two replicates of treatment 2 <br /> <br />is not known, but it seems likely that there was reduced water flow from the diluter to these tanks <br /> <br />during the first month of the depuration period. <br /> <br />Water Quality <br /> <br />Mean water quality characteristics in exposure tanks during the adult exposure were <br /> <br />. .. <br /> <br />within 10% of measured values in the blending tanks, except for alkalinity, chloride, and <br /> <br />conductivity (Table I), The high chloride and conductivity values in the adult exposure water, <br /> <br />compared to those in blending tanks, may be partly due to the dissolution of uneaten food as the <br /> <br />diets were formulated to contain 2.57% NaCI by weight (T. Brown, BioProducts, personal <br /> <br />communication). The reason for the reduced alkalinity in the adult tanks compared to the <br /> <br />blending tanks is not known. Typically, DO concentrations decreased after feeding began and <br /> <br />remained below the prefeeding concentrations until the tanks were siphoned and filtered. <br /> <br />Mean (SD) concentrations of measured solids in adult exposure water were 19,8 (l0.3) <br /> <br />mg!L for total suspended solids, 2.8 (6.6) mglL for fixed suspended solids, and 17.2 (10.6) for <br /> <br />volatile suspended solids, Mean (SD) turbidity of the same water was 6,9 (3.7) NTU. These <br /> <br />26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.