Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,_0,,", <br />'....--' <br /> <br />~^") <br />N <br />.....1 <br />I-'" <br />c..o <br /> <br />CHAl'l'Jili m <br />MUNICIPAL DAMAGE ESTIMATES <br /> <br />THE CALIFORNIA INVESTIGATION <br /> <br />It has been recognized for some time that <br />variations in the chemical constituents of water may <br />induce differences in corrosion rates, thereby affec- <br />ting the lifetimes of household water conveyance <br />systems as well as household appliances using water. <br />In this study, an attempt was made to measure <br />economic losses associated with various salinity levels <br />in household water (Appendix 4). Losses were <br />measured for galvanized wastewater pipes, galva. <br />nized water pipes, brass faucets, dishwashers, <br />washing machines, and garbage disposals. A statisti. <br />cal analysis was undertaken to compare estimated <br />mean lifetimes for households in two locations in tbe <br />Los Angeles area of California. <br /> <br />Proeedure <br /> <br />Two municipal locations in the Los Angeles area, <br />San Fernando Valley and Costa Mesa- Newport Beach, <br />were divided according to socio.economic units based <br />on differences in median home value, mediaD contract <br />rent, number of persons per household, age of <br />structure, etc. A third area, Long Beach, was also <br />included in portions of the analysis. Plumbing <br />contractors serving each ofthese areas for at least 12 <br />years were also contacted along with local appliance <br />dealers. This survey was designed to provide a <br />distribution of lifetime estimates by type of plumbing <br />fixtures or appliances. A regression analysis exami- <br />ning the relationship between estimated lifetime, total <br />dissolved solids (TDS), and the socio.economic <br />variable was conducted. <br /> <br />A Conceptual Model <br /> <br />There are basically two approaches to analyzing <br />consumer or household decision-making with respect <br />to water quality. One is to assume that sufficient <br />low-cost information is available to home buyers such <br />that preferred locations, those with the higher water <br />quality, are valued more highly by consumers. <br />Another assumption is that information costs are <br />relatively high and water quality characteristics are <br />considered insignificant to the home buyers when <br />compared with other locational considerations (travel <br />time to work, depreciation rates, socio.economic <br />attributes of the neighborhood, etc.). <br /> <br />Since the aggregate cost of water softening <br />devices, bottled water, acid rinses for swimming <br />pools, additional detergents, and other direct consu. <br />mer expenditures for reducing the effect of poor water <br />quality are typically less than 2.3 percent of income, it <br />would appear more realistic to presume that <br />information costs on water quality exceed the <br />expected benefits of such information. It was assumed <br />that the home buyer makes his purchase decision <br />independent of variations in water quality except for <br />an estimate of the corrosion of faucets and pipes. and <br />perhaps a query on the age and condition of <br />appliances. Once location is selected, then the <br />consumer considers combinations of defensive expen- <br />ditures designed to achieve a desired level of water <br />quality. Many of these defensive expenditures might <br />be partially or completely capitalized into property <br />values. <br /> <br />Defensive expenditures undertaken by the indi. <br />vidual household would partially reflect economic <br />losses associated with direct physical damages or loss <br />of palatability due to poorer water quality. In <br />consequence, it was anticipated that actual marginal <br />damages (WLD) would exceed measured physical <br />damages (WLW), but were either greater or less than <br />the losses capitalized in property values. That is, <br /> <br />WLp ;. WLD> WLW <br /> <br />When the quality of water delivered to the <br />household could not be altered, it was anticipated that <br />the consumer would then make decisions designed to <br />achieve suitable water quality through various water <br />use activities. Tbose decisions included the purchase <br />and use of a water softener, bottled water purchases, <br />increased lawn and shrub watering, etc. Since the <br />household cannot directly purchase water of varying <br />quality, a demand function is not observable. The <br />approach taken in this study was to estimate physical <br />damages in terms of expected lifetimes and assume <br />that the household would be willing to pay up to the <br />economic value of those physical damages to avoid <br />them. Clearly, this estimate does not consider how the <br />household might, acting individually. avoid some or all <br />of the consequences of poor water quality. <br /> <br />19 <br />