Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Table 1:. Summaf'/l of yield lo..e. in the Pacific Coast area due to increasing salinity of irrigation water from the <br />(::.:) Colorado River and irrigation method as compared with present water quaUty and best irrigation <br />) practice - thousand tons. <br />!\) <br />...::r Total Dissolved Solids in Irrigation Water, rug/1 <br />t- Crop Irrigations <br />~ Per Year 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 <br /> Avocados Surface 0.6 1.7 2.8 <br /> 13,256 Ac. Sprinkler 0.6 <br /> Trickler <br /> Grapefruit Surface 0.55 0.80 1.06 1.36 1.55 4.50 <br /> 655 Ac. Sprinkler 0.16 0.40 0.69 0.93 1.24 1.60 <br /> Trickler <br /> Lemons Surface 3.5 5.1 6.8 8.6 9.8 21.1 <br /> 3.158 Ac. Sprinkler 1.0 2.5 4.4 5.9 7.9 10.2 <br /> Trickler <br /> Naval Oranges Surface 0.55 0.82 1.08 1.39 1.58 3.39 <br /> 1,145 Ac. Sprinkler 0.15 0.40 0.70 0.94 1.26 1.63 <br /> TrickIer <br /> Valencia Oranges Surface 4.48 6.52 8.64 11.09 12.64 27.14 <br /> 9,465 Ac. Sprinkler 1.30 3.26 5.63 7.58 10.11 13.05 <br /> TrickIer <br /> Potatoes Surface 0.06 0.27 <br /> 625 Ac. Sprinkler <br /> Trickler <br /> Strawberry Surface 0.29 0.64 0.99 <br /> 635 Ac. Sprinkler <br /> Trickier <br /> Tangerine Surface 0.78 Ll3 1.49 1.92 2.19 4.70 <br /> 1,070 Ac. Sprinkler 0.22 0.56 0.97 1.31 1.75 2.26 <br /> Trickler <br /> Summer Tomatoes Surface 0.11 0.29 0.49 0.64 0.80 0.97 <br /> 330 Ac. Sprinkler 0.21 0.42 0.59 0.77 <br /> Trickler <br /> Fall Tomatoes Surface 0.74 1.88 3.28 3.75 5.16 6.56 <br /> 3,135 Ac. Sprinkler 1.41 2.81 3.98 5.16 <br /> Trickier <br /> Spring Tomatoes Surface 0.2 0.8 1.4 1.6 2.2 14.3 <br /> 1,019 Ac. Sprinkler 0.6 1.2 1.7 2.2 <br /> Trickler <br /> Limes Surface 0.22 0.32 0.42 0.54 0.61 1.31 <br /> 325 Ac. Sprinkler 0.06 0.16 0.27 0.37 0.49 0.63 <br /> Trickle! <br /> <br />then used as inputs to a linear programming profit <br />maximization model, wherein the optimal farmer <br />response to salinity change was delineated. From this <br />optimization for salinity levels from 900 to 1,400 mg/l, <br />a damage function was defined for each impact area. <br />This linear programming work was carried out by <br />personnel of the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />The Linear Programming Model <br /> <br />The linear programming routine (APEX.I), <br />utilized for analysis, was a program supplied by <br />Control Data Corporation and run on the CDC Cyber <br />74/28 system of the Bureau of Reclamation in Denver. <br />This LP package has sufficient capacity and flexibility <br />to allow modeling of all sizes of irrigation districts. <br /> <br />The model was designed to maximize net returns <br />to aU farmers in a district above variable production <br />costs and 'new capital investments subject to resource <br />and production constraints. Detailed enterprise <br />budgets for the crops representative of conditions in <br />each irrigated area were used to develop the input for <br />the linear programming model. <br /> <br />The crops used were alfalfa hay, cotton, sugar <br />beets, sorghum, wheat, barley, lettuce, tomatoes. <br />asparagus, onions, watermelon, carrots, and canta- <br />loupe which account for about 90 percent of the <br />acreages. Each of these crop activities was defined on <br />four soil drainage conditions: very poorly drained, <br />poorly drained, moderately well drained, and well <br />drained. Tbe combination of each crop under each soil <br /> <br />13 <br />