Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C) <br />-.J Table 8. SUmmaf'/l of yield losse. on the &ilt River Valk~ Water U.ers A..ocmtion lands due to increasing <br />f\) .aUnit'll of.rrigation water from the Central ANona Project and irrigation method as compared with <br />--J present water quaUty and be.t irrigation practice, projected on. the basis of 150, 000 acre feet per year <br /> of CAP water and 1,050,000 acre feet of SRP water. <br />-..l T.D.S. <br /> Total Dissolved SoUds In C.A.P. Water, mg/l <br /> of 900 1100 1400 <br /> Crop Irrigations S.R.P. <br /> Per Year Water T.D.S.1n C.A.P.. S.R.V.W.U.A. Blend <br /> 565 607 632 669 <br /> Alfalfa (fons) 16 460 1380 2300 <br /> 43,655 Ac. 22 230 1380 <br /> 29 690 <br /> Lettuce (Cartons) 16 3170 4120 6020 7920 <br /> 750 Ac. 22 1270 2220 3640 6020 <br /> 29 480 1270 2690 4590 <br /> 35 950 2690 <br /> Onions (Tons) 16 15 82 212 149 <br /> 945 Ac. 22 45 67 112 <br /> 29 22 52 90 <br /> 35 35 35 <br /> Grapefruit (Tons) 16 56 169 169 254 <br /> 1,550 Ac. 22 21 70 169 <br /> 29 35 106 <br /> 35 35 <br /> Oranges and Tangerines (Tons) 16 99 161 297 446 <br /> 3,090 Ac. 22 37 124 297 <br /> 29 62 186 <br /> 35 62 <br /> Carrots (Tons) 16 175 205 265 490 <br /> 865 Ac. 22 115 145 190 265 <br /> 29 75 115 160 220 <br /> 35 20 60 115 160 <br /> Sprinkler <br /> <br />Table 4. Summaf'/l of yield lo.ses in the SRP supplemental area due to increasing saUnit'll of irrigation water <br />from the CAP blended into the SRP irrigation ''IIstem, and irrigation method as compared with pre.ent <br />water quaUt'll, and best irrigation practices. <br /> <br /> T.D.S. T.D.S. in C.A.P. Water, mg/l <br /> of <br />Irrigations S,R.P. 900 1100 1400 <br />Per Year Water T.D.S. in C.A.P. - S.R.P. Blend, mg/l <br /> 565 <br /> 607 632 669 <br />16 30.0 91.0 152.0 <br />22 15.0 91.0 <br />29 46.0 <br /> <br />Crop <br /> <br />Alfajfa (fans) <br />2,560 Ac. <br /> <br />pumpage is 160,000 ac ft with an average TDS of 1,800 <br />mg/l. If they were allotted 40,000 ac ft of CAP water, <br />they could eliminate some of their worst wells which <br />with the CAP water would Improve their water <br />quality at least until the CAP water reaches 1,800 <br />mg/I.Their blend would then go to 1,825 mg/I when <br />the CAP water reaches 1,400 mg/I. <br /> <br />The RID crop land is mostly well drained (85,000 <br />acres well, 2,280 acres moderate, and 880 acrea poor) <br />and therefore would be little affected by the salinity of <br />CAP water. Yield losses, due principally to irrigation <br />methods, are summarized in Table 7. <br /> <br />San Carlos Project <br /> <br />The San Carlos Project encompasses 100,000 <br />acres of Indian and non-Indian lands. The water <br />supply averages approximately 190,000 ac ft of surface <br />water and 75,000 ac ft of groundwater annually. This <br />irrigates, after system losses, approximately 50,000 <br />acres with less than 4 feet of water per year. If they <br />were allotted 160,000 ac ft of CAP water and allowed <br />to pump 60,000 ac ft by lining the canals and laterals <br />they could irrigate approximately 80,000 acres with 4 <br />feet of water per year. <br /> <br />6 <br />