<br />,,_"'.1 f
<br />
<br />000066
<br />
<br />1788
<br />
<br />BROWN AND DANIEL: LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS OF RIPARIAN ENVIRONMENTS
<br />
<br />TABLE I. Photo Sample Dates and Flow Levels
<br />
<br />their willingness to pay for alternative flow conditions,
<br />represented by photographs taken the previous summer. The
<br />photos depicted flow in the river at eight ftow levels, from 50
<br />to 1150 cfs (10410 32.6 m'/s), al eacb of four sites. Respon-
<br />dents were shown pairs of photos of the same scene at two
<br />flow levels and questioned about their willingness to pay, in
<br />the form of entrance fees or sales taxes, to have one as
<br />opposed to the other flow level. For anglers and shoreline
<br />recreationists, responses indicated a concave relationship of
<br />willingness to pay to flow level. similar to Litton's [1984]
<br />observations for the aesthetics of flow.
<br />In this study we focused not on willingness to pay but on
<br />scenic beauty per se. Scenes were presented to observers in
<br />two formats that dlffered in the degree to which they tended
<br />to focus observers' attention on flow rate. Different formats
<br />were used because different patterns of actual use of the
<br />river may enhance or diminish the user's awareness of
<br />varying flow levels. We hypothesized that (I) regardless of
<br />presentation format, scenic beauty would, as Liuon (1984J
<br />suggested, increase with flow to a point and then decrease at
<br />higher flow levels, but (2) flow would be more important in
<br />explaining variance in scenic beauty when the method of
<br />presentation focused attention on flow level.
<br />
<br />METHODS
<br />
<br />To explore the relationship between streamflow and public
<br />perception of scenic beauty we adapted psychophysical
<br />methodology [Daniel and Vining, 1983: Zube et al., 1982]
<br />that has often been applied to evaluate forest scenic beauty
<br />[e.g.. Schroeder and Daniel. 1981; Buhyoff et al., 1982; Ribe.
<br />1990]. Briefly, this required (I) photographing numerous
<br />views along the Poudre River. each at numerous flow levels.
<br />(2) obtaining and scaling viewers' scenic beauty judgments
<br />of the scenes, (3) measuring numerous chal.'"acteristics or the
<br />scenes, including flow level. and (4) comparing viewers'
<br />scaled scenic beauty judgments with the measures of the
<br />scene characteristics to better '.:!"!derstand the influence of
<br />the characteristics on public perception of scenic beauty. We
<br />used a photographic medium to be able to present the
<br />alternative environmental conditions to the same observers
<br />under constant experimental conditions. Judgments of pho-
<br />tographs have repeatedly been found to correlate highly with
<br />judgments of onsite scenes (e.g.. ShurrleM..orth. 1980; Stew-
<br />art et al.. 1984],
<br />
<br />Representation of Environmental Conditions
<br />
<br />Twenty-two points along the 40-mi (64.4 km) stretch of the
<br />mainstem of the Cache La Poudre River within the wild and
<br />scenic area upstream or Fon Collins, Colorado. were se-
<br />lected for this study. Each point was photographed in the
<br />upstream and downstream directions, resulting in 44 sepa-
<br />rate views. No two views capture the same ponion of river.
<br />Obvious evidence of human interference (people. vehicles,
<br />bridges or buildings, roads, or power lines) was avoided in
<br />all views because an occasional incidence of such features
<br />would tend to bias the scenic beauty judgments.
<br />Points were located to capture the considerable variation
<br />in vegetation, topography, channel morphology, vantage
<br />point. and view distances within the wild and scenic area.
<br />The mix of scenes included, for example. the range from
<br />narrow, steep canyons of rock with little vegetation to wide
<br />valleys with much vegetation and little rock and the range
<br />
<br />Dale (1988) CFS'
<br />June 7 2643
<br />June 14 2304
<br />June 22 1975
<br />June 30 1202
<br />July 8 715
<br />July 21 479
<br />Aug. 25 373
<br />Sept. 9 152
<br />
<br />.Cubic feet per second (I cfs equals 2.832 x 10-2 m]/s) at the
<br />lower end of the inventoried stretch of river. measured at USGS
<br />gauge 06752000, located 1.9 miles (3.1 km) upstream oCTed's Place
<br />(turnoff (0 gauge is 1.7 miles (2.7 km) from Ted's Place; gauge is
<br />about 0.5 mile (0.8 km) downstream from Poudre Valley Canal
<br />diversion and low head dam) and adjusted for upstream diversions
<br />(Poudre Valley Canal, Monroe Gravity Canal. Fort Collins pipe-
<br />line). Bankfull flow is roughly 2500 cfs (71 m3/s).
<br />
<br />from the dry hillsides of desert vegetation at the downstream
<br />end of the canyon to forests of spruce. fir, and aspen at the
<br />upper end. Vantage points included at the water's edge, from
<br />bridges above the water, and from elevated slopes looking
<br />down on the river. View distances varied from near-view
<br />scenes, including only the width of the river, the slope, and
<br />the vegetation a few yards back from the river's far bank, to
<br />vista scenes showing the river in the foreground or mid-
<br />ground and far-off mountains in the background. Including
<br />the full mixture of scenes was necessary to determine
<br />whether or not the relationship of scenic beauty to flow was
<br />dependent on the particular characteristics of the surround-
<br />ing landscape.
<br />Previous psychophysical scenic beauty studies, which
<br />focused on forests, lakes, and other relatively passive scen-
<br />ery, have exclusively used still photography (usually color
<br />slides) to depict the scenes. However, because we were not
<br />confident that still photography would adequately represent
<br />the dynamic nature of streamflow in scenes of the Poudre
<br />River. we presented the scenes to viewers as video se-
<br />quences. Video images were recently shown to yield envi-
<br />ronmental quality judgments for passive scenery that were
<br />highly comparable to those of color slides [Vining and
<br />Orland, 1989], and thus appeared to offer no drawbacks, but
<br />video images offered the important potential advantage of
<br />depicting water movement.
<br />Photo points were carefully marked to facilitate capturing
<br />the same view each time the photographer returned to the
<br />site. Photo inventory days were selected to capture nearly
<br />the full range of flow levels encountered during the declining
<br />portion of the hydrograph of the 1988 runoff season. Scenes
<br />were photographed at eight flow levels, ranging from 2643
<br />cfs (74.84 m'/s) on June 7 to 152 cfs (4.30 m'/s) on September
<br />9 (Table I). Flow diminished 10 about 50 cfs (104 m'/s) later
<br />in the fall, but by then the leaves on deciduous trees had
<br />turned. dramatically altering the appearance of the vegeta-
<br />tion, so that such scenes could not be included with earlier
<br />scenes to evaluate scenic beauty. '
<br />The order in which points were photographed on different
<br />occasions was systematically varied to avoid capturing a
<br />given view at the same sun angle each time. Clear, sunny
<br />days were preferred, but the weather in the Poudre Canyon
<br />is highly variable. and we found it impossible to always
<br />avoid cloudy weather and still photograph at the appropriate
<br />
<br />
<br />j.
<br />pph.
<br />photol
<br />Vid,
<br />a Son
<br />cordel
<br />obsen
<br />absent
<br />each s
<br />12 s 0
<br />dropp'
<br />216 sc
<br />eight (
<br />F10'
<br />sured
<br />strearr
<br />just U1
<br />levels
<br />basin t
<br />levels
<br />estim;;
<br />
<br />Scenh
<br />
<br />Seer
<br />beaut~
<br />actual
<br />rating
<br />able. I
<br />wide'
<br />scene
<br />would
<br />throu~
<br />that ti'
<br />people
<br />thai ..
<br />scenic
<br />consic
<br />design
<br />type, .
<br />was J'
<br />The
<br />flow r.
<br />live sc
<br />the SC:l
<br />design
<br />thougl
<br />indica
<br />ismor
<br />same
<br />seasor
<br />the sit
<br />Rat
<br />scene~
<br />requir
<br />used t.
<br />and L
<br />soned
<br />20 ba!l
<br />preser
<br />more'
<br />The
<br />that dl
<br />
|