Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,,_"'.1 f <br /> <br />000066 <br /> <br />1788 <br /> <br />BROWN AND DANIEL: LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS OF RIPARIAN ENVIRONMENTS <br /> <br />TABLE I. Photo Sample Dates and Flow Levels <br /> <br />their willingness to pay for alternative flow conditions, <br />represented by photographs taken the previous summer. The <br />photos depicted flow in the river at eight ftow levels, from 50 <br />to 1150 cfs (10410 32.6 m'/s), al eacb of four sites. Respon- <br />dents were shown pairs of photos of the same scene at two <br />flow levels and questioned about their willingness to pay, in <br />the form of entrance fees or sales taxes, to have one as <br />opposed to the other flow level. For anglers and shoreline <br />recreationists, responses indicated a concave relationship of <br />willingness to pay to flow level. similar to Litton's [1984] <br />observations for the aesthetics of flow. <br />In this study we focused not on willingness to pay but on <br />scenic beauty per se. Scenes were presented to observers in <br />two formats that dlffered in the degree to which they tended <br />to focus observers' attention on flow rate. Different formats <br />were used because different patterns of actual use of the <br />river may enhance or diminish the user's awareness of <br />varying flow levels. We hypothesized that (I) regardless of <br />presentation format, scenic beauty would, as Liuon (1984J <br />suggested, increase with flow to a point and then decrease at <br />higher flow levels, but (2) flow would be more important in <br />explaining variance in scenic beauty when the method of <br />presentation focused attention on flow level. <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />To explore the relationship between streamflow and public <br />perception of scenic beauty we adapted psychophysical <br />methodology [Daniel and Vining, 1983: Zube et al., 1982] <br />that has often been applied to evaluate forest scenic beauty <br />[e.g.. Schroeder and Daniel. 1981; Buhyoff et al., 1982; Ribe. <br />1990]. Briefly, this required (I) photographing numerous <br />views along the Poudre River. each at numerous flow levels. <br />(2) obtaining and scaling viewers' scenic beauty judgments <br />of the scenes, (3) measuring numerous chal.'"acteristics or the <br />scenes, including flow level. and (4) comparing viewers' <br />scaled scenic beauty judgments with the measures of the <br />scene characteristics to better '.:!"!derstand the influence of <br />the characteristics on public perception of scenic beauty. We <br />used a photographic medium to be able to present the <br />alternative environmental conditions to the same observers <br />under constant experimental conditions. Judgments of pho- <br />tographs have repeatedly been found to correlate highly with <br />judgments of onsite scenes (e.g.. ShurrleM..orth. 1980; Stew- <br />art et al.. 1984], <br /> <br />Representation of Environmental Conditions <br /> <br />Twenty-two points along the 40-mi (64.4 km) stretch of the <br />mainstem of the Cache La Poudre River within the wild and <br />scenic area upstream or Fon Collins, Colorado. were se- <br />lected for this study. Each point was photographed in the <br />upstream and downstream directions, resulting in 44 sepa- <br />rate views. No two views capture the same ponion of river. <br />Obvious evidence of human interference (people. vehicles, <br />bridges or buildings, roads, or power lines) was avoided in <br />all views because an occasional incidence of such features <br />would tend to bias the scenic beauty judgments. <br />Points were located to capture the considerable variation <br />in vegetation, topography, channel morphology, vantage <br />point. and view distances within the wild and scenic area. <br />The mix of scenes included, for example. the range from <br />narrow, steep canyons of rock with little vegetation to wide <br />valleys with much vegetation and little rock and the range <br /> <br />Dale (1988) CFS' <br />June 7 2643 <br />June 14 2304 <br />June 22 1975 <br />June 30 1202 <br />July 8 715 <br />July 21 479 <br />Aug. 25 373 <br />Sept. 9 152 <br /> <br />.Cubic feet per second (I cfs equals 2.832 x 10-2 m]/s) at the <br />lower end of the inventoried stretch of river. measured at USGS <br />gauge 06752000, located 1.9 miles (3.1 km) upstream oCTed's Place <br />(turnoff (0 gauge is 1.7 miles (2.7 km) from Ted's Place; gauge is <br />about 0.5 mile (0.8 km) downstream from Poudre Valley Canal <br />diversion and low head dam) and adjusted for upstream diversions <br />(Poudre Valley Canal, Monroe Gravity Canal. Fort Collins pipe- <br />line). Bankfull flow is roughly 2500 cfs (71 m3/s). <br /> <br />from the dry hillsides of desert vegetation at the downstream <br />end of the canyon to forests of spruce. fir, and aspen at the <br />upper end. Vantage points included at the water's edge, from <br />bridges above the water, and from elevated slopes looking <br />down on the river. View distances varied from near-view <br />scenes, including only the width of the river, the slope, and <br />the vegetation a few yards back from the river's far bank, to <br />vista scenes showing the river in the foreground or mid- <br />ground and far-off mountains in the background. Including <br />the full mixture of scenes was necessary to determine <br />whether or not the relationship of scenic beauty to flow was <br />dependent on the particular characteristics of the surround- <br />ing landscape. <br />Previous psychophysical scenic beauty studies, which <br />focused on forests, lakes, and other relatively passive scen- <br />ery, have exclusively used still photography (usually color <br />slides) to depict the scenes. However, because we were not <br />confident that still photography would adequately represent <br />the dynamic nature of streamflow in scenes of the Poudre <br />River. we presented the scenes to viewers as video se- <br />quences. Video images were recently shown to yield envi- <br />ronmental quality judgments for passive scenery that were <br />highly comparable to those of color slides [Vining and <br />Orland, 1989], and thus appeared to offer no drawbacks, but <br />video images offered the important potential advantage of <br />depicting water movement. <br />Photo points were carefully marked to facilitate capturing <br />the same view each time the photographer returned to the <br />site. Photo inventory days were selected to capture nearly <br />the full range of flow levels encountered during the declining <br />portion of the hydrograph of the 1988 runoff season. Scenes <br />were photographed at eight flow levels, ranging from 2643 <br />cfs (74.84 m'/s) on June 7 to 152 cfs (4.30 m'/s) on September <br />9 (Table I). Flow diminished 10 about 50 cfs (104 m'/s) later <br />in the fall, but by then the leaves on deciduous trees had <br />turned. dramatically altering the appearance of the vegeta- <br />tion, so that such scenes could not be included with earlier <br />scenes to evaluate scenic beauty. ' <br />The order in which points were photographed on different <br />occasions was systematically varied to avoid capturing a <br />given view at the same sun angle each time. Clear, sunny <br />days were preferred, but the weather in the Poudre Canyon <br />is highly variable. and we found it impossible to always <br />avoid cloudy weather and still photograph at the appropriate <br /> <br /> <br />j. <br />pph. <br />photol <br />Vid, <br />a Son <br />cordel <br />obsen <br />absent <br />each s <br />12 s 0 <br />dropp' <br />216 sc <br />eight ( <br />F10' <br />sured <br />strearr <br />just U1 <br />levels <br />basin t <br />levels <br />estim;; <br /> <br />Scenh <br /> <br />Seer <br />beaut~ <br />actual <br />rating <br />able. I <br />wide' <br />scene <br />would <br />throu~ <br />that ti' <br />people <br />thai .. <br />scenic <br />consic <br />design <br />type, . <br />was J' <br />The <br />flow r. <br />live sc <br />the SC:l <br />design <br />thougl <br />indica <br />ismor <br />same <br />seasor <br />the sit <br />Rat <br />scene~ <br />requir <br />used t. <br />and L <br />soned <br />20 ba!l <br />preser <br />more' <br />The <br />that dl <br />