|
<br />31
<br />
<br />Table1
<br />Rio Grande Decision Support System
<br />Consultant Cost Summary
<br />(Dralt - June 15, 1998)
<br />
<br />Contractor
<br />Ground Water
<br />
<br />Feas.Study
<br />Reference Description
<br />5,2,7 Ground Water Model
<br />5,2.1,5 Ground Water Data
<br />5.2.13.3 User Involvement (1)
<br />5,2,13 Consultant Management (2)
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Surface Water
<br />
<br />5,2,2
<br />5,2,13,3
<br />5,2,13
<br />
<br />Consumptive Use and Water Bu 5.2,3
<br />5,2,8
<br />5,2,1,3
<br />5,2.13,3
<br />5,2,13
<br />
<br />DSS System Integration
<br />
<br />5,2,9-13
<br />5,2,13,3
<br />5,2,13
<br />
<br />Project Management Assistanc 5.2.13
<br />
<br />State
<br />
<br />5,2.1.4
<br />5,2.1,1
<br />5,2,1.2
<br />5,2,6
<br />5,2.4
<br />5,2,2,6
<br />N/A
<br />5,2,13,1
<br />
<br />Water Resources Planning (3)
<br />User Involvement (1)
<br />Consultant Management (2)
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Consumptive Use
<br />Water Budget Analysis
<br />Irrigated Acreage
<br />User Involvement (1)
<br />Consultant Management (2)
<br />Total
<br />
<br />DSS Integration
<br />User Involvement (1)
<br />Consultant Management (2)
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Management
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Well Permits and Water Rights
<br />Stream Gages, twelve
<br />Diversion Gages, eight
<br />Big River Model
<br />Administration Tool
<br />StateMod Code Enhancement
<br />Research with USGS (4)
<br />State Project Management
<br />Total
<br />
<br />To be determined later (year 2 or 3 activity) Data Extension
<br />Management (1)
<br />Total
<br />
<br />Project Total
<br />Feasibility Total
<br />Difference
<br />
<br />Item
<br />Amount
<br />$258,560
<br />$2,701,000
<br />$12,450
<br />$193.848
<br />$3,165,858
<br />
<br />$236.000
<br />$12,450
<br />$24,845
<br />$273,295
<br />
<br />$65,720
<br />$51,080
<br />$113,450
<br />$12,450
<br />$24,270
<br />$266,970
<br />
<br />$212,420
<br />$12,450
<br />$22,487
<br />$247,357
<br />
<br />$150,000
<br />$150,000
<br />
<br />$130,000
<br />$192,900
<br />$137.250
<br />$36,000
<br />$64,700
<br />$21.000
<br />
<br />$270,000
<br />$851,850
<br />
<br />$25,500
<br />$2,550
<br />$28,050
<br />
<br />$4,983,380
<br />$4,983,380
<br />$0
<br />
<br />~ )~
<br />9~ ~ ~J:.
<br />~// \~ {,~
<br />:pI, )v W~ ~ (II
<br />~( ~~'
<br />~~~ \~
<br />~ 01
<br />i
<br />
<br />(1) Feasibility StUdy Budget of $49,800 distributed to four major contractors evenly,
<br />(2) Feasibility Study Consultant Mgt. Budget distributed to contractors based on 10 percent
<br />of fee, except the Ground Water Data Contractor which took the balance.
<br />(3) Feasibility Study Budget of $275,000 adjusted down by $39,000 since the State
<br />will identify and perform the StateMod Code Enhancement (5.2,2,5 and 5,2,2.6)
<br />(4) Item not included in original Feasibility StUdy BUdget. Expect to pay based on savings
<br />associated with State performance of selected tasks.
<br />
<br />c:\w\rgdss\contracts
<br />
<br />6/22/98 - 1
<br />
|